[DSC]

The fact that the go-to position is partisan is part of the reason why we don't take national security seriously and why other nations have little faith in us.

Pierre Poilievre's decision not to obtain a security clearance is 'interesting' and does raise very valid questions and even more concerns about his fitness to be our PM, god forbid!.

"NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's failure to obtain a security clearance sends ‘a message to the Indian government that there’s one leader who is willing to look away.’ The RCMP alleged Monday that agents of the Indian government have played a role in widespread violence in Canada."

 

[kEiThZ]

The fact that the go-to position is partisan is part of the reason why we don't take national security seriously and why other nations have little faith in us.

How exactly can this be made perfectly non-partisan? If the RCMP ends up charging one party's members more than another because those are facts of the case, it will still be viewed as partisan. And when you have parties refusing to even participate in the process, that makes it even worse.

Our major parties are all substantially compromised. The CPC is way too close to India. The LPC is way too close to China. And the NDP almost acts like Gaza is our 14th territory. The Bloc, ironically, may be the only honest party on foreign policy.

 

[lenaitch]

Pierre Poilievre's decision not to obtain a security clearance is 'interesting' and does raise very valid questions and even more concerns about his fitness to be our PM, god forbid!.

"NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's failure to obtain a security clearance sends ‘a message to the Indian government that there’s one leader who is willing to look away.’ The RCMP alleged Monday that agents of the Indian government have played a role in widespread violence in Canada."

View attachment 604859

Some might wonder that, to be a member of the Privy Council and a member (or aspirant) of the Executive (PM + Cabinet) a condition would be an ability and willingness to hold a security clearance.

 

[lenaitch]

How exactly can this be made perfectly non-partisan? If the RCMP ends up charging one party's members more than another because those are facts of the case, it will still be viewed as partisan. And when you have parties refusing to even participate in the process, that makes it even worse.

Our major parties are all substantially compromised. The CPC is way too close to India. The LPC is way too close to China. And the NDP almost acts like Gaza is our 14th territory. The Bloc, ironically, may be the only honest party on foreign policy.

It probably can't be, but a sworn witness at an enquiry made a statement that is more at home during question period. It would have been just as accurate and truthful to say that he is aware of 'some parliamentarians involved in foreign interference'.

 

[kEiThZ]

I hope we get the list of names.