So, the Trudeau government again showing the intent to drive down wages rather than implement intelligent policy.
Immigration Minister Mark Miller says the country is looking for a more sustainable and affordable solution to shelter an influx of people claiming refugee status
www.theglobeandmail.com
Marc Miller talking about the need to buy (more) hotels in order to house asylum seekers. Don't get me wrong, if we had (in the largest number) genuine asylum seekers as we generally define them....
Those fleeing persecution based on ethnicity/religion etc, or fleeing famine or war.......... I would have no issue w/making every effort to be as generous as possible.
But by the government's own admission, most claimants are arriving from countries at peace, with food, and without evidence of wide-spread persecution.
From the above:
View attachment 577255
Of the above countries, Columbia has generally had a very good economy, is democratic, and features a rising standard of living....... less true for Kenya and Nigeria, but the the majority of residents in those countries, it would be economic
opportunity they are seeking, not asylum was we normally define it. Venezuela is a bit different; though more stable than it was a year ago.
But a veritable dictatorship aside, its principle issue standard of living wise is U.S. imposed oil sanctions.....
****
Here's the thing, if we're getting lots of people claiming asylum from places that don't justify such a claim, we ought to be imposing/toughening VISA requirements. We should also be turning people away when they make a claim, as-of-right, if it doesn't meet the prima facie standard of legitimacy. (Meaning on its face the claim stands no chance of success).
But instead of tackling the issue was we should and choking off the flow of people, we are instead going to spend a few billion housing them....sigh.