News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
 8.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
 4.7K     0 

SunriseChampion said:
...but what's the diff between having Metro council and 6 city councils and having one city council and 6 (I know it's less) community councils.

Same diff, no?
Click to expand...

Community councils have virtually no legislative power. With individual cities they can control their own fates, needs, etc much like the amalgamated City of Toronto does.

Metro dealt with cross border issues like emergency services, transit, etc while the cities dealt with their own boards of education, utilities, zoning and the like.
 
Richard White said:
Community councils have virtually no legislative power. With individual cities they can control their own fates, needs, etc much like the amalgamated City of Toronto does.

Metro dealt with cross border issues like emergency services, transit, etc while the cities dealt with their own boards of education, utilities, zoning and the like.
Click to expand...

What do community councils do?
 
Richard White said:
Community councils have virtually no legislative power. With individual cities they can control their own fates, needs, etc much like the amalgamated City of Toronto does.

Metro dealt with cross border issues like emergency services, transit, etc while the cities dealt with their own boards of education, utilities, zoning and the like.
Click to expand...

The Boards of Education were wholly independent of the cities, as they are today.
 
afransen said:
That's rather dramatic. I think MPPS should be allowed to disagree (and voice opposition from their constituents).

I like that in the UK, government backbenchers have some leeway in criticizing their own party's policies.
Click to expand...

On other issues - probably; but directly challenging the policy direction of the sitting premier during these times - and undermining the message? The optics alone wouldn't have allowed him to stick around.

AoD
 
AlvinofDiaspar said:
On other issues - probably; but directly challenging the policy direction of the sitting premier during these times - and undermining the message? The optics alone wouldn't have allowed him to stick around.

AoD
Click to expand...
I'm troubled by the chilling effects. We don't have to like what he says to defend his right to speak on behalf of his constituents. I feel turfing from caucus should be done for cases of misconduct. Merely disagreeing with government policy does not rise to that level.
 
afransen said:
I'm troubled by the chilling effects. We don't have to like what he says to defend his right to speak on behalf of his constituents.
Click to expand...

I am sure he could have said it privately - this public call is clearly calculated to cause damage. In any event - no one stopped him from issuing that statement - he just have to live with the consequences of breaking with the premier.

AoD
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top