News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.8K     0 

Signs are useless when the streets are designed for the "safety" of speeders.

A fine statement Walter, but please don't tell me with a straight face that the above proposals are designed for the safety of speeders. That's absurd.

They don't have to be so wide. If a moving van or garage truck still has to move through them, automobiles can still pass on them on the opposite side of the street.

The proposed streets are not particularly wide, but they do need to allow for delivery trucks and fire trucks, as well as turning radii to/from laneways.
 
Signage ought to work if there are modal filters preventing through traffic and no general access parking.
It won't have a 100% success rate, but it should be pretty close. Right now the City looks like they will be making the streets curbed from other streets, providing visual deterrents, as well as be putting planters in the ROW to really emphasize that it's not a place to drive. If they plop down some "local access only" signs, it'll probably do a pretty good job, if not absolutely perfect. Every one will be a half-block long dead end, so I really don't see a lot of cars using them.

My one comment would be that they still plan to have the driving areas in the pedestrian priority spaces be dropped 2 inches from the sidewalk and will be cobblestone in paving with the sidewalks still being concrete - I would simply prefer if there was no curb drop to make it extra clear that you aren't supposed to be driving there unless you are accessing local property. that's the standard in Europe, and you can just put bollards at the end where cars are really banned. If you really want to differentiate the pedestrian only areas, you could just use different coloured pavers or a concrete band or something with no grade change.
 
A fine statement Walter, but please don't tell me with a straight face that the above proposals are designed for the safety of speeders. That's absurd.

Not the safety, but, definitely the convenience. They say it's done this way to keep the traffic moving.
 

Quebec drivers must now learn the 'Dutch reach'

From link.

Quebec's auto insurance board (SAAQ) training courses and exams will now require drivers in the province to understand the "Dutch reach."

The Dutch reach is a method of opening a car door so drivers are forced to look behind them and avoid "car dooring" cyclists.

The SAAQ "Pivot door opening" has been integrated into the Road Safety Educaiton Program and includes the need for the "observe-evaluate-act" (OEA) sequence when leaving a vehicle where drivers check the rear-view mirror and blind spots before opening their door, SAAQ communications director Meetu Madahar said.

Driving schools were informed of the addition in December.
"Pivoting to open the door is a simple manoeuvre that is recognized as an effective way of preventing cyclists' exposure to the risks associated," said Madahar. "In addition to cyclists exposed to this risk, other road users can also be victims, notably moped riders, motorcyclists and motorists."

A Quebec coroner's report from June recommended adding the Dutch reach manoeuvre to driving courses after cyclist Jean-Pierre Lefebvre was doored and killed in LaSalle in July 2020.

Geneviève Thériault recommended new drivers be taught to open their door with their right hand to encourage a safer blind spot check.
"Pivoting to open the door is a simple manoeuvre that is recognized as an effective way of preventing cyclists' exposure to the risks associated," said Madahar. "In addition to cyclists exposed to this risk, other road users can also be victims, notably moped riders, motorcyclists and motorists."
Madahar said the delay in implementing the recommendation was to give time for the SAAQ to study them and determine how to apply the recommendation.

"In some cases, regulations or laws have to be changed, which can take time," she said. "In this case, the technique had to be incorporated into the driving course curriculum. The change needs to be incorporated when updating, adjusting the training materials, training the trainers, modifying the tests if necessary."
 
If you're able to drive an unsafe speed on a road like that, there are issues with the design. Sure seemed like he was driving awfully fast for so many obstructions, but a street like this should not be straight and flat. Some chicanes would do a lot to calm traffic so drivers aren't focused far down the road.

While this is correct, and street designs are important, we also can't let drivers off the hook. People need to pay attention while driving and always act in a safe manner. Stricter driving tests, and occasional retesting should be part of the solution as well.
 
While this is correct, and street designs are important, we also can't let drivers off the hook. People need to pay attention while driving and always act in a safe manner. Stricter driving tests, and occasional retesting should be part of the solution as well.
Driving tests in Germany are strict.


 

Why It’s So Hard to Import Small Trucks That Are Less Lethal to Pedestrians

From link

pexels-julia-volk-5273211.jpg

Rural Americans are buying miniature trucks from Japan that meet their needs better than U.S. megacars — and renewing calls for Congress to make it easier to buy smaller, safer vehicles from overseas, at least while U.S. automakers refuse to produce them here.

In a recent viral article for the Economist, Carmageddon author Daniel Knowles reported that U.S. demand is growing for small-format “kei trucks,” a Japanese micro-vehicle class created during World War II when full-sized car parts were expensive to produce. Those models, though, are increasingly sought-after among rural Americans today who want a pick-up that can actually fit through the doors of the average garage or barn.

Unlike U.S.-made models, kei trucks are subject to strict size and engine standards and generally top out at around 1,800 pounds. The average American pick-up, by contrast, weighs 5,000 pounds or more, and is significantly more lethal to pedestrians, cyclists and even the occupants of smaller cars because of their hulking size and massive blind spots.
Kei trucks, though, are still a relative rarity on U.S. roads, thanks in large part to the Imported Vehicle Safety Compliance Act of 1988, which bans the sale of most foreign cars newer than 25 years old. That law is theoretically meant to keep dirty and unsafe vehicles that don’t rise to U.S. safety and emissions standards out of the country, while still allowing car enthusiasts access to collectible vintage models that they’re not likely to drive very much, if at all.

In the case of kei trucks — which usually don’t have things like airbags and must be retrofitted upon arrival to move the steering wheel from the right side of the vehicle to the left — those restrictions make a kind of sense; many states, after all, don’t even allow mini-trucks to be operated on high-speed public roads, and many kei owners operate them exclusively on farms or other private property.

In one critical way, though, kei trucks and other small-format foreign cars actually exceed U.S. safety standards: because Japanese and European regulators both factor in the safety of people outside of vehicles, while Americans don’t. And when it comes to sustainability, most other countries may soon have us beat, too — particularly if U.S. automakers continue to ditch small-format EVs that make efficient use of scarce battery materials in favor of producing every more hulking E-SUVS and pick-ups that gobble those materials up.
Seen through that lens, some car fans argue that U.S. import laws are more “about protecting car companies and their dealers [from] so-called ‘grey imports'[that] were eating heavily into automakers’ domestic profits” before the ban was enacted, to quote Jalopnik’s Alex George.

Sustainable transportation advocates might argue they’re also protecting an auto-centric status quo in which Americans are too afraid to walk, bike, or roll, lest they be struck by an outsized automobile — and that to shift the balance, Congress must take action to let mini-cars in.
 
Yes, I read it. It is all in relation to the US so isn’t particularly relevant. I am asking how this impacts us here in Canada. And how does it impact Toronto’s Vision Zero?
Canada also has the same fetish for big, strong, oversized vehicles, using to fetch some milk at the big box store. The big trucks are a safety problem for pedestrians.
4eksph0s63x81.png


From link.
 

Back
Top