innsertnamehere
Superstar
in what developed country's context do you have a rail line running 2,000 kilometers while only passing through 3 cities over 100,000 and none over 160,000? I'm not advocating for a highway border to border necessarily either, but an rail line in the corridor is pointless. Due to the low ridership of a would be rail line (Even at 200km/h rail or something I am doubtful it would require more than a few daily trains) I don't see how you could rationally argue that a rail corridor is the preferred option to move people on this corridor, period.