dforthandbview
Senior Member
Oh, ok. Carry on
|
|
|
The TPS news release about her disappearance from last year doesn't exist anymore: http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/newsreleases/pdfs/25667.pdf
the strategy known as duck, dodge, and hide...this schlub has the gall to stand for public office after everything that has come out
You may be right; the original comment isn't as clear as it could be. If so, I misunderstood that person's intent, so I was less unfair and more just plain incorrect.
I would sincerely love to know what criminal investigation could be compromised by the airing of the Rob Ford crack video, and at what point Ford derives an unfair advantage from something like that being withheld. The police have protected him quite enough for my liking; let's start with Ford being driven home by 23 Division because he was too drunk to be behind the wheel of his Escalade, and go from there.
I'm sure we can all agree that it's hard to feel good about protecting rabbit holes when Ford is repeatedly getting the sort of breaks that no-one should be afforded, ever.
What sort of swing in election results might result from the release - or otherwise - of a video where one of the candidates smokes crack cocaine and hurls slurs in all directions?
Serious question: given that Ford's aim is essentially to dismantle the City of Toronto, what investigation could be so precious that it is worth handing Ford a pass on all of this?
Here's a view into the minds of the construction trades...
http://www.canadiancontractor.ca/un...CNTV-EN01032014&e=x144ry4lW8qn2vwrqsp2q8vwM20
Here's a view into the minds of the construction trades...
http://www.canadiancontractor.ca/un...CNTV-EN01032014&e=x144ry4lW8qn2vwrqsp2q8vwM20
TPS doesn't sound like such a sloppy organization to NOT address someone being found - they do it all the time...
Strange.
OTOH - Could RoFo be a "part owner/backer" of a group involved with a (medically licensed - and somewhat "loop hole" legal) "grow-op"?
I can imagine setting up a medical grow-op can be pricey and nothing says if you need to borrow capital to set one up that it (the capital) has to be from a bank.... There may not be anything necessary illegal about this position but it might be very damaging to a campaign - unless the proceeds are not being properly claimed in his tax return.
Here's a view into the minds of the construction trades...
http://www.canadiancontractor.ca/un...CNTV-EN01032014&e=x144ry4lW8qn2vwrqsp2q8vwM20
WELL SAID
He is one politician that is fighting the unions and other government privileged.
The interesting thing is that more and more people are starting to recognize the unfair situation that now exists.
People in the private sectors are starting to grasp the costs of salaries, benefits and pension plans that the public sector workers enjoy at the expense of our tax dollars…….and the reality that the cost of these programs is not sustainable.
There was a time when many would consider the benefits that public sector employees were getting and think… ” good for them ! ”
BUT, now, most people don’t have these kinds of perks in their employment anymore and are often struggling just to make ends meet.
So now the sentiment is ” why should my tax dollars give them so much, when I can’t get any of those benefits myself”
And, hopefully, that is the beginning of a turning tide.
We need politicians like Rob Ford that are able to fight for us and our tax dollars……and say ” we can’t afford that ! “
The article has this gem of a comment:
This in the same week we learned how much higher CEO pay is than the average worker (171 times IIRC). And yet the "enemy" is the public sector employee who makes $50K plus pension and benefits? The divide-and-conquer strategy is working brilliantly.
Then the people then complain they don't have a job, but will continue to buy goods "MADE IN CHINA" or someplace in the Far East because it's cheaper. They don't know that by doing so they are preventing jobs being made in Canada. This happens with outsourcing jobs or "skills" so it will look good on the balance sheet or for the "taxpayer".