|
|
|
It has already been pointed out that the quote about knowing an (unnamed) female related to the "mystery visitor" at City Hall.
ETA: SlumDoug now telling reporters he "100%" "unequivocally" never met McRobb. So, of course, he did.
I thought the unknown female visitor at CH was explained by Doug as a longtime friend of the family, move along, nothing to see here, zing, done?
I believe someone here floated the theory that it was her employers sent her to rehab and that her continued employment depended on her successful completion of the programme. It makes way more sense than a bank firing someone for the company she keeps. That, in fact, would probably break labour law.
You are correct that it is more likely her termination was the result of failure to successfully complete rehab, if in fact her termination occurred after her stint there. As a long time sr HR practitioner and a former bank employee, I would be surprised if she were fired because of Ford rather than failed rehab. As for breaking labour laws, well sadly it happens all the time. As we always say, you can fire anyone you want any time you want if you are prepared to pay the consequences, that generally being severance.
That's not generally how it's done. It opens up all sorts of nasty legal quagmires, including wrongful dismissal, bad faith discharge and potential grounds for Human Rights. Banks in particular tend to be quite cautious where HR matters are concerned. As I said, you can fire anyone you want, anytime you want if you are prepared to pay the consequences. This type of termination would be very messy legally and from a PR perspective and would be hard to defend. Fail rehab and it pretty much goes away. Firing an addict without a chance to recover is viewed like firing any person with an illness: cold and callous. This also opens the employer up to punitive damages.Why wouldn't the company just fire her period? That sounds like a far neater way of dealing with it.
AoD
That's not generally how it's done. It opens up all sorts of nasty legal quagmires, including wrongful dismissal, bad faith discharge and potential grounds for Human Rights. Banks in particular tend to be quite cautious where HR matters are concerned. As I said, you can fire anyone you want, anytime you want if you are prepared to pay the consequences. This type of termination would be very messy legally and from a PR perspective and would be hard to defend. Fail rehab and it pretty much goes away. Firing an addict without a chance to recover is viewed like firing any person with an illness: cold and callous. This also opens the employer up to punitive damages.
Again - it has already been posted today that she lost her job at the bank months before the few days she was at GreeneStone and that the job she claims to have lost due to association with Ford (f it existed at all) has to have been after her few days at GreeneStone if she only met Ford after he arrived there.
Who turned out to be fraudulently using a disabled parking permit.
One of the things I've learned from the Rob Ford Saga, is: OMG! I have to start a label business because the profits must be incredible!
Although Doug claims 100 mil in sales, google searching puts them closer to 25 to 35 mil. The profit on that seems to be enough so that all 3 brothers and even a nephew can live like millionaires. They all seem to have an endless supply of money to spend on booze, drugs, ladies, rehabs, season tickets, cars, car repairs, private jets, the best criminal lawyers.. etc.
I would have thought the label business was pretty competitive with very tight margins. Makes you wonder if Apollo Beauty is paying a premium price for labels because of the "great service" the company provides. ie: Pay a little extra for your labels and we can make your zoning problems go away!