News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.5K     0 

  • Thread starter CanadianNational
  • Start date
Sozzi.png
 

Attachments

  • Sozzi.png
    Sozzi.png
    40.5 KB · Views: 322
The Kitchener Sears at Fairview mall is under major renovation. My guess is they are going to give the store an industrial discount look, with the bare concrete floors like the Guelph Sears.

The one half of the store is a construction zone, so everything was crammed to one side. Which actually made the store seem busy with lots of people browsing.
 
Sears Canada is changing its strategy by launching an off-price retail concept/shop-in-store: http://www.retail-insider.com/retail-insider/2017/3/sears-the-cut

It'l play in the same space as Winners/Marshalls/HomeSense/Saks Off 5th/Nordstrom Rack. It'l also have a lot of private label Sears product in the non-'outlet' part of the store.
 
Last edited:
As was speculated months ago in this thread, by @Bruno Republic and @Northern Light I think. They have to try something, but there are bigger players in that arena that have more expertise. But if they can shake up their stodgy image, and successfully get in on a growing market segment, then good for them.

The logic of the pop-up eludes me, though.
 
Is it just me, or does "The Cut" just sound like a terrible name for this, above and beyond the unfortunate and insensitive connotations that @AlvinofDiaspar correctly noted?
 
Interesting Canadian perspective on the U.S. Sears effectively announcing that it sees itself going belly up.


‘Turbulent times’ as U.S. parent raises questions about fate of Sears Canada
Marina Strauss, The Globe and Mail, 22 March 2017

Some key quotes for those of you who aren't G&M subscribers:

- Last fall it unveiled new prototype stores – smaller than regular ones – aimed at focusing on its fashion and other key categories in less space, as well as adding groceries. But the initiatives haven’t been enough to reverse its downward spiral.

- But he said Sears Canada’s fourth quarter results, which are expected to be released next month, are “likely awful” so it can “cushion the news with liquidity lined up.”

- With Sears Holdings faltering, joint merchandise procurement is likely to be the biggest issue for Sears Canada, he said. “Also spillover anxiety could further hurt appliance sales in Canada.”

- The landlords all have contingency plans, or are developing potential blueprints, for Sears sites, anticipating potential problems at the department-store retailer, he said. “This is no longer Plan B – it’s Plan C,” Mr. Williams said. “They did their Plan B on Targets.”

- He said Sears Holdings’ move this week to essentially pre-announce that it has serious doubts about whether it can continue as a going concern is a rare step for a retailer to take, signaling that it’s in trouble. The move will make suppliers even more hesitant to ship products to Sears unless they’re paid in full in advance, he said.

- No obvious suitors have emerged for Sears but archrival Hudson’s Bay Co. may want to pick it up at a very low price, he said. “If the price is right I’m sure they would consider it.” [Doubt it, as Sears has already unloaded the valuable real estate and leases that would have interested Richard Baker]
 
"With Sears Holdings faltering, joint merchandise procurement is likely to be the biggest issue for Sears Canada."

Is it possible that this is one the reasons Sears Canada is going purely private label and off-price? They expect difficulties in continuing to stock major brands, so are going to stick with their own private label and with overstock merchandise that TJX didn't want?
 
He said Sears Holdings’ move this week to essentially pre-announce that it has serious doubts about whether it can continue as a going concern is a rare step for a retailer to take, signaling that it’s in trouble. The move will make suppliers even more hesitant to ship products to Sears unless they’re paid in full in advance, he said.

The first article you posted mentioned the reason why: a 2014 update in accounting regulations requires them to mention in their financial statements if they have doubts that the business can continue to be operated as a going concern. Presumably this regulation was put in place to prevent potential investors from being duped into getting on board a sinking ship.
 
Is it possible that this is one the reasons Sears Canada is going purely private label and off-price? They expect difficulties in continuing to stock major brands, so are going to stick with their own private label and with overstock merchandise that TJX didn't want?

Sounds quite plausible to me.
 
The sad thing with all this is that the Chairman in Canada is trying to delude people into thinking that a downfall in Sears in the U.S will have no impact on Canadian operation.

That's outright non-sense coming out of the mouth. The logic that is being used: Sears Holdings no longer owns shares of the Canadian operation and as such anything that happens there has little effect on operations here. If only people realized that Uncle Eddie owns nearly as much of the holding company in the U.S as he does in Sears Canada through his little pet project ESL Investments.

The only thing that's holding Uncle Eddie to Sears Canada is that he's trying to extract as much value from the American operations before it nosedives. If the same thing happens to Sears Canada he will do the exact same thing here. He's only in it since he's first in line to get paid once the company fizzles out.
 
Sears was always going to be a hard ship to steer, but its current state can be almost entirely attributed to Eddie Lampert, who seems less interested in saving Sears than in stripping and selling everything of value.

I wonder in a hypothetical sense- if some new CEO took over with a mandate to salvage and stabilize the remnants, what would the resultant 'Sears' look like?

Perhaps a rump chain of specialty retailers (the same way Woolworth's lives on through Foot Locker)? Something like a Winners?


Also interesting noting that 2017 seems to be the red year for big traditional department stores.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money...enney-macys-mcsports-gandermountian/99492180/
 
Last edited:
Also interesting note- 2017 perhaps looks to be a red year for many additional retailers as well:

Moody's: Number of distressed retailers nearing recession-era levels

Dive Brief:
  • Distressed bond issuers in the U.S. retail and apparel markets are nearing recession levels, tripling in the past six years, according to a report released by Moody’s Investors Service on Monday and emailed to Retail Dive.

  • The report found that 13.5% of Moody’s retail and apparel portfolio is distressed, compared to 16% during the Great Recession. Debt maturities are also headed toward record levels over the next five years, according to Moody's.

  • Retailers at risk — due to factors like stressed liquidity, weak quantitative credit profiles, challenged competitive positions, sponsor ownership and erratic management structure — include Claire’s, rue21, Sears, J Crew, Payless, Nine West, Gymboree, NYDJ Apparel, True Religion, Indra, Bon Ton department stores, David’s Bridal, TOMS Shoes, Tops, Velocity, Fairway, 99 Cents Only Stores, Charming Charlie and Evergreen Saver’s.

http://www.retaildive.com/news/mood...etailers-nearing-recession-era-levels/437050/
 

Back
Top