I used the SRT daily this past summer. A lot of people criticize the SRT as dysfunctional and poorly-conceived. I don't disagree that it has issues, but I'd like to acknowledge some positives. For one, it's faster than the subway and its frequency is good for a suburban service. The trains brake smoothly--after a week I realized that you didn't have to grip the pole while the train was braking upon approaching a station like on the subway--it's just that refined. (Though I kept my hand by the pole since you never know what could happen in any train.) The reliability of the trains was impeccable: in the summer months, the trains only stopped on the tracks once between stations, and I never waited more than 5 minutes for a train. Also, for all those who say that the subway should be extended to STC, I noticed that the trains--already narrower and smaller than subway cars--are fairly empty outside of rush hour.
No one ever seems to compliment the style of the SRT stations. Its minimalist modern architecture seems fairly unique for the Postmodern 1980s, with extensive tinted glazing, purposefully and interestingly exposed structural framing, subtle touches of brick, and painted metal ceilings. Seeing Kennedy's penthouse platform for the RT in the morning feels suavely metropolitan as the light pours in and you take in panoramic views of the cityscape around the station. I know that the system has problems with snow, and that some stations like Ellesmere are located in the rail corridor, isolated from the communities they serve and almost useless. But it seems like no one ever acknowledges the unique merits of the system. Some of them are characteristics that we can only strive to achieve in the subway system, like the smooth braking.