howl
Active Member
To get back to the original thread topic - I wonder why the Globe & Mail and The Wall Street Journal would both publish such articles the same week.
It's fairly obvious to most educated people that both types of system have their benefits, and both types of systems are currently being built or planned across the GTA. It's not an either/or proposition, but whether or not a certain route is more efficient or effective with one or the other depending on the context and needs.
There is obviously some political gamesmanship afoot. The question is: Who is behind it, and why?
It's fairly obvious to most educated people that both types of system have their benefits, and both types of systems are currently being built or planned across the GTA. It's not an either/or proposition, but whether or not a certain route is more efficient or effective with one or the other depending on the context and needs.
There is obviously some political gamesmanship afoot. The question is: Who is behind it, and why?