Further to my last post..
1) The exit seems so ridiculously concealed and their door is so non-descript... it looks like an emergency exit, hardly the gateway to a major retail/entertainment complex
2) To fight with crowds, then to navigate through the bowels of TLS to get back to street level, I can see people transferring from the 505 to the station will avoid using the TLS entrance... I know I'd rather just walk across the street to Dundas and use the wide staircase there (which incidentally is my favourite street entrance to the subway)
3) That being said, if I were one of the businesses renting on the "subway concourse" level, I would be completely second guessing my investment. PenEquity no doubt probably commanded a premium for locating right by the subway entrance, especially for basement space that would otherwise be dirt cheap. I would have expected a high-quality connection to the station. This is hardly so, and with comment #2 in mind, the actual number of people going through this concourse is probably going to be a lot less than what PE would have been selling. Simply just compare this connection to the Eaton Centre one.. granted, there's more space on TEC"s side, but there's nothing to say they couldn't have made a larger tunnel or at least install a second set of doors. I can't think of a SINGLE subway connection to a building that is linked by only ONE set of doors... this automatically limits the number of people who will be going through it. If I was leaving AMC and there was a rush, again, I would much rather leave the building on the ground floor and cross the street than be smushed into a small tunnel.
There's cheapouts, but this cheapout is just.. ridiculous.