Northern Light
Superstar
I don't have a problem with taxes as long as they are freely chosen
What does this constitute in your mind? A referendum for every tax or increase in rate?
and pay for for something that only government can provide effectively.
We're really only discussing highways here, which by their nature are monopolies; as really, are most public transit operations.
As such they would generally be best suited to public sector ownership.
I'd consider debt servicing a waste of money, and borrowing excessively to pay for what we can't afford is irresponsible.
I completely agree with this statement. Which makes it all the more necessary to increase revenue such that any investments made are on a cash-from-current basis, rather than debt.
Where's the high speed rail and other great infrastructure?
Clearly, a material portion of the debt to date has gone to temporary income supports for people and business alike.
Little, if any (on a net new basis) has gone to infrastructure.
Last edited: