Miscreant
Senior Member
I too usually am a stickler for symmetry, but I think that the appearance of unevenness at the top adds to its character and flavour.
It's still too early to render a final judgement as far as I'm concerned—the balconies up here are not clad yet, and there are other finishing touches to go—so how can you tell what the final effect will be yet?
Whereas you react negatively to what look like uneven floors to you, I see a cue that the building is finishing up with special detailing, and I appreciate the wide expanse of reflective glass. Not sure if there will be lighting in behind this section, but possibly the gaps are there for interesting nighttime effects.
That said, that they have "messed up" is entirely subjective on your part, VS.
I too usually am a stickler for symmetry, but I think that the appearance of unevenness at the top adds to its character and flavour.
I have no preference for either(symmetry/asymmetry). But if one of a buildings core features is its symmetry, the lack there of in one specific region is a little off putting/jarring. That's not to say that I think it "ruins" the building, overall its a positive addition to the skyline. I just think it would of looked better with symmetry.
They should paint it white.
it will look much better if they use tiles of some metal or the metal used in the pillars used to hold the cheese thing.
example
h[/QUOTE] Yes, I agree, covered in...nt. (paint is the bare minimum they could do)