Jun 17, 2023

B2084857-0BB8-4DF1-A219-E6C1C6B61BF4_1_201_a.jpeg
 
Northern Light said:
Hmmm, permits here are moving slower than molasses....... I wonder if @ProjectEnd has any insights.
Click to expand...

Apparently @ProjectEnd is mum on this one, which is a shame, because I would like to know why they having yet more meetings w/the Councillor on this.....wow is this drawn out.
 
A few more storeys and wrapping up outstanding SPA items. Can't say much more than that because both the City and Hullmark do watch this particular forum. In fact, previous changes to the building form that were recommended here were implemented to everyone's' celebration. UT gets results!
 
Copying the Cover Letter over, explaining the changes:

1697495380693.png

1697495407909.png

1697495446637.png

1697495470192.png


The above reflects @ProjectEnd 's helpful response to me in August, which I somehow missed. Oops; thanks PE!

@Art Tsai will wish to make note of the changes in height, in both storeys and M; this one is now 17 storeys high.
 
For @smably and a couple of others who mentioned this site in the context of the Wellington Bike lanes in discussions in the last day or two.....a look at the plans here:

1697496207923.png


A bit larger to add clarity:

1697496257967.png


1697496325083.png
 
Hmmmmm not sure about this one

IMG_0422.jpeg


This looks a bit off to me - The previous version handled this section better. I get wanting to simplify for construction however this just feels too abrupt to me.


IMG_0421.png


Perhaps a simple solve could be to step the street wall down towards the neighbouring building - would make this transition a bit less awkward.

IMG_0420.png
 
Hey Santa, for Christmas I want another 50 buildings like this. edit: Kirkor has some decent, cleaner designs lately. I think most arch firms can design decent stuff if they try. Dreck is more on the devs who cheap out.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top