I just don't buy the argument that the owner of a heritage property (and this was a company, not a local guy who inherited the joint from his favorate aunt) shouldn't be responsible to keep up with maintenance and current fire regualtions - or any property for that matter. We know what kind of rent they were charging here, you can't convince me that this owner couldn't invest any money into keeping the property safe and up to code. They still had two empty floors above which, with money invested, could have brought in perhaps triple the amount of rent that they were already making each month prior to the wall collapsing last April. I won't pretend that old buildings aren't expensive to maintain, they are, so are buildings built in the 50's, 60's and 70's.
Anyway, pedestrian traffic has re-opened on the west side of Yonge Street today between Elm & Dundas Sts.