Doppleganger
Active Member
Lets call it what it is...tokenism. By permitting it, the city can pat itself on the shoulder in the delusional belief their preserving a piece of our heritage, but what they're really doing is a disservice to new/contemporary projects by forcing them to commit a form of architectural fraud. If a building is worthy of being listed as historically or architecturally significant then that building deserves to be preserved in it's entirety!
Last edited: