someMidTowner

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
9,333
Reaction score
15,144
August 9th:

IMG_4318.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4318.JPG
    IMG_4318.JPG
    2.3 MB · Views: 277

ADRM

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
5,737
Reaction score
18,393
This tower isn't catching enough flack around here. It's cheap-as-it-gets dogshit.

Podium is nice enough if rather generic, but it's a part of a nice little streetwall forming.

image.jpeg
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 249
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 264
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 263

junctionist

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
9,138
Reaction score
3,140
It's hard to tell if it's a good or bad building in terms of architecture. Hence, it's a little noir.
 

mcornett

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
420
Reaction score
1,516
I'm not sure why this tower is criticized so heavily. Sure, it's not as perfect as the renders suggest, but I look at it every day from my office and in decent lighting it is attractive. Certainly better than Pinnacle on Adelaide or even Charlie in my opinion, though not nearly as attractive as King Charlotte.
 

ADRM

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
5,737
Reaction score
18,393
I'm not sure why this tower is criticized so heavily. Sure, it's not as perfect as the renders suggest, but I look at it every day from my office and in decent lighting it is attractive. Certainly better than Pinnacle on Adelaide or even Charlie in my opinion, though not nearly as attractive as King Charlotte.

It's deservedly criticized because overt blandness and obvious cheapness are its two most prominent features.
 

Top