Tuscani01
Senior Member
LOVE the lighting feature and so glad it is actually happening!
I'm glad that the lights are happening, but will these not shine into residents' units? I'd fear that the condo corp. would shut them off following complaints.
I don't think it'll be much of an issue - similar to the lights on the bridge at Parade in Cityplace
^ We got a pessimistic here.
Isn't the upper portion of the tower for non-residential use?
My comment has nothing to do with Aura itself but, with these lower cost LED bars connections deteriorating in no time. You see it the world over including Toronto. As a tight budgeted condominium, I don't see top quality LEDs used which aren't maintenance free to keep them lit either.
My comment has nothing to do with Aura itself but, with these lower cost LED bars connections deteriorating in no time. You see it the world over including Toronto. As a tight budgeted condominium, I don't see top quality LEDs used which aren't maintenance free to keep them lit either.
It all depends on how and what the LED lighting is being included for. If it is part of the building's public art contribution, the condo board has no choice but to maintain the lights. They can be taken to court for not maintaining them. A few of the older CityPlace buildings had started shutting down their lights (incandescent though), due to cost. When approached by Concord Adex and the city to re-light their buildings, the boards ended up having to replace their lighting systems with LED's in order to lower their costs, as opposed to eliminating the feature altogether as they intended.
The public art installation atop The Met condos, "The Harbinger", hasn't worked since November or December of 2012. Then there's TRUM's failed installation.
There's been some complaints about the lights there, as they do shine into units. The lights on Aura, however, do not face any units, so it shouldn't be an issue at all.