Ok, I think @3Dementia is almost caught up now............so time to continue the photo drops.

Pics taken Sept 26th, 2024:

DSC04683.jpg


DSC04684.jpg


DSC04685.jpg


DSC04686.jpg


DSC04687.jpg
 
@innsertnamehere is correct above. Here are some screenshots from the most recent elevations drawings from Dec 2023.
View attachment 598757View attachment 598758View attachment 598759

The West is going to be mainly curtainwall as it does not have balconies.
The East and South will have window walls for the sections that have balconies and curtainwall for all other sections.
The North is going to have only window wall as it has balconies all the way through.

Hope this helps! And hope Concord don't change this in any future iterations of the design!
cladding will make or break this building! I have hope based on these elevations.
 
What was the final layout here in terms of retail/office/institutional space ? I was trying to dig that up but couldn't find it.
 
You guys are arguing the same thing...

...the only difference here is that due the size of this building it will be much more apparent if they full out VE the cladding. And yes, being Concord...this is a real concern here.
 
Yeah. But it is a valid argument because each building is individually judged.

This reply makes no sense to me. Regardless if each building is being judged individually, it's the cladding that makes or breaks the building. I statement stands....
 
...that's pretty much the KPF proposal-that-was. To which I had speculated would be likely cheaper to build than the balcony mess Concord where proposing when they first took over this. So saved by the VE bell I guess.

Edit: It also looks like KPF have also gotten back into the driver's seat from the DB header.
The design never changed when Concord took over to be clear - there was simply a bad rendering posted which was wildly mis-interpreted.
 

Back
Top