BurlOak
Senior Member
Yeah, I always thought the the tunneling was relatively cheap (the boring itself) and it was the installation of track, electrical, signaling, etc. that drives up the cost.
I found this from an article regarding Sheppard's construction from 2000:
When you ask why Vancouver can build a much less expensive rapid transit line, it is stated that the cost of the track, electrical, signalling are minor and the lack of tunnelling is the reason for the low cost. When it is pointed out that over half is burried, the answer is that it is not tunnelled using TBM, but cut-and-cover. When it is pointed out that there was a TBM portion, it is stated that is was small.
When you ask why Madrid can build subway for $100M/km and Montreal can build the Laval extension for $140M/km, the answer is that the extra cost is all due to the more difficult soild conditions in Toronto and/or the need for twin tunnels instead of just one.
There is also comments how expensive stations are in Toronto due to the depth required for TBM construction, but Metrolinx recently said that the Leslie Station would have cost $80M. This for a station that is 20m deep and below river level.
Something seems a bit fishy about the costs of subways in Toronto. I am not sure what the reason is, but Toronto seems to pay more per km than other transit systems and there is no rational reason on why.