Just because the TTC said it, doesn't make it so. All of the controversial stations in question were named long before the pencil pushers who run the TTC these days came to be in their employ; if one looks back at recent TTC history, they are not always in touch with reality. In 2021, when they were doing the 100 year anniversary PR campaign, there were a few errors. Just because someone claimed that all of those stations fell cleanly into those naming conventions, doesn't mean they actually knew the minds of those who selected the names. I would need to see reports from the era the stations were built in to be convinced.
It is not because I have a difficulty accepting facts. It is because I struggle greatly to believe that our public institutions believe us to be so gullible as to claim that the big honking subway station called Yorkdale, integrated with a mall called Yorkdale that opened almost 15 years prior, is somehow
not named for the mall, but the neighbourhood nearby, but it somehow coincidentally happened to be the same name, is too astonishing to believe. That is some Orwellian level gaslighting. And even if they somehow intended it to be so, the fact that no one except for locals are even aware of the community being called Yorkdale means that they're doing unpaid advertising for Yorkdale Mall
anyway. Ask
any passenger on the next subway platform you step on where Yorkdale gets its name from; no one is going to mention the neighourhood. If they wanted to be so free of the bonds of corporate naming, they would've called it Ranee, Highway 401, or Glen Park.
Also, their figures are off. In whichever way one chooses to classify them, whether they be destination or districts, there are 11, possibly 12 stations that are named for these: North York Centre, Rosedale, Union, St. Andrew, Osgoode, St. Patrick, Queen's Park, Museum, Yorkdale, Downsview, High Park, and STC. If such a basic count is wrong, what else did the comrades get wrong?
St. Patrick is on the list as it is commonly accepted it was named for the Catholic Church on Dundas Street, which, while unhelpful, seems infinitely more likely than an irrelevant side street, while Queen's Park could be classified as either or, as University Avenue turns into Queen's Park at College, and the institution of Queen's Park is extremely irrelevant for the majority of people who use the station.
It doesn't for bus station names.
Well, I don't believe
that. If there were no naming conventions for bus stops, then a stop could be called just about anything. There seems to be a clearly defined method for how the TTC names their bus stops.
Do 95% of bus stops even have any kind of "name"?)
If the bus announces the stop, it has a name.
I'm done with this debate. If you want to continue on presuming that these subway stations with the same names as the institutions located right next to them are not named for those institutions, there is nothing I can say to convince you.