Skeezix
Senior Member
I think the fountain in the south end was primarily removed to expand the (then) seating area for the food court. Cost of upkeep may have played a role, but selling more fast food was undoubtedly the primary motivation.
I'm not sure that CF is dying to remove the main fountain. Had they wanted to do so, they presumably would have done so as part of the most recent renovations.
I too bemoan all of the "improvements" done over the years which have gradually stripped away the character of the centre. Heritage considerations aside, I think it's sad that the most recent renovations stripped away so many signature elements and replaced them with common mall fixtures. Yes, the railings, etc. look new and modern (for now) but also unremarkable and bland -- CF destroyed a lot of the sense of place, and made it look more like any other mall. There are so many ways they could have updated and replaced the fixtures in a manner that preserved the original look of the centre, but instead they went the generic route.
As for the heritage issue, I don't recall hearing anyone seriously advocating for the preservation of the TEC interiors at the time. That's partially a result of the common heritage discourse in this city, which is almost entirely focused on exteriors and where many residents think heritage = Victorian. But, nonetheless, I don't recall any heritage/modern architecture advocates urging a heritage designation (pls correct me if I am wrong). If we as a community don't value the resources, we can't lay too much blame at the feet of CF.
I'm not sure that CF is dying to remove the main fountain. Had they wanted to do so, they presumably would have done so as part of the most recent renovations.
I too bemoan all of the "improvements" done over the years which have gradually stripped away the character of the centre. Heritage considerations aside, I think it's sad that the most recent renovations stripped away so many signature elements and replaced them with common mall fixtures. Yes, the railings, etc. look new and modern (for now) but also unremarkable and bland -- CF destroyed a lot of the sense of place, and made it look more like any other mall. There are so many ways they could have updated and replaced the fixtures in a manner that preserved the original look of the centre, but instead they went the generic route.
As for the heritage issue, I don't recall hearing anyone seriously advocating for the preservation of the TEC interiors at the time. That's partially a result of the common heritage discourse in this city, which is almost entirely focused on exteriors and where many residents think heritage = Victorian. But, nonetheless, I don't recall any heritage/modern architecture advocates urging a heritage designation (pls correct me if I am wrong). If we as a community don't value the resources, we can't lay too much blame at the feet of CF.
Last edited: