News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.1K     0 

Definitely 2025 before the whole thing from Renforth to Kennedy is fully operational. Maybe Mount Dennis to Kennedy is running in a rough form in 2024.

Renforth to Mount Dennis is scheduled for opening in 2031 I believe. There's no way they're opening the west extension in 2 years! They haven't even awarded the contracts for the stations and the elevated sections.
 
All the stations are basically complete and the fact they opened the eglinton platform extension kind of confirms that.
They are still pouring concrete to finish some of the structures at Eglinton. They've only just started to backfill and cover the excavations.

So no, just because part of the subway interface is done doesn't mean that the whole station is done.

Dan
 
Renforth to Mount Dennis is scheduled for opening in 2031 I believe. There's no way they're opening the west extension in 2 years! They haven't even awarded the contracts for the stations and the elevated sections.
Ah, my mind rarely lingers on the Toronto-Mississauga border. That's badlands beyond that horizon. Let's hope the Province has learned from this debacle and looks at who's doing the job on the Mount Dennis to Kennedy section.

I wonder what will be operational first, the California High-Speed Rail system or the Crosstown.
 
Last edited:
The Star is out with a big article on the state of the Crosstown, having been given a tour of about 1/4 of the line by Crosslinx.


Its behind the paywall, but we all know how to address that now!

Lots of photos and some tidbits. There's also a video as well.

I will pull just a couple as teasers, for the rest, follow the link.

1684585773144.png

Credit: Toronto Star

1684585859966.png

Credit: Toronto Star

Now for some substance:

Eglinton Station should be structurally wrapped up below grade by mid-summer; but the roads and sidewalks won't be fully restored in the area until November.

Eglinton, Kennedy and Cedarvale stations are all suffering from significant leaking, solutions have been proposed, I'm unclear if they've been accepted.

Crosslinx is ticked at Mx, in part, because there is still no operating agreement in place with the TTC. The real issue here seems to be that as the TTC inspects the project before assuming operations
they are 'ordering' changes to bring it up to their standard; a standard different that the one Crosslinx says was in the project spec.

Example given is that the vehicles for the Crosstown don't properly interface w/the TTC's radio network, so the TTC wants changes. The project spec apparently didn't require such interoperability and Crosslinx doesn't want to pay the bill
to make changes.

Comment: This is the problem with having Mx and I/O involved in writing an agreement for which they lack the requisite technical experience and staff. Whatever process one chooses to use for tendering, the end-use operator needs to be involved at the design and contract language stages.

Crosslinx is also looking for Mx to release 300M it is holding back due to non-performance.
 
Last edited:
At the very least, have SOME of the stations on Line 5 open for "Open Doors 2023"!!!

:eek:

It's Doors Open not Open Doors.

Semantics aside they are all still considered construction sites and likely not safe for public use.

If they were safe enough for public use the line would open rather imminently.
 
It's Doors Open not Open Doors.

Semantics aside they are all still considered construction sites and likely not safe for public use.

If they were safe enough for public use the line would open rather imminently.
(Ouch. My wrist hurts. Corrected.)

The public was allowed into the Mt. Dennis storage facility back during 2019.

 
I never understood the logic of opening future transit stations for doors open. It didn't make sense in 2017, and it doesn't make sense now. At length, the stations will be open to the public and thousands of people will pass through them every day. Doesn't that go against the whole point of Doors Open? The event is supposed to show off interesting facilities the average joe doesn't, and won't, have regular access to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: max
I never understood the logic of opening future transit stations for doors open. It didn't make sense in 2017, and it doesn't make sense now. At length, the stations will be open to the public and thousands of people will pass through them every day. Doesn't that go against the whole point of Doors Open? The event is supposed to show off interesting facilities the average joe doesn't, and won't, have regular access to.
We get "previews" of new homes before occupancy. Even stores and restaurants have "soft opening" before the "official opening".
 
That's nice, but again, that goes against the spirit of Doors Open. There's nothing special or interesting about opening a soon to be public station ahead of time so people can look around. If Metrolinx wants to show off their new toys, they can do so at any time.

Look at any TTC facility, or any industrial facility like Billy Bishop Airport, RC Harris, or the Port Lands Energy Centre, facilities the public will never have access to, to understand what the point of Doors Open is.
 

Back
Top