News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.7K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.5K     0 

I too have mused about this, but don't assume that this is sustainable. A heritage fleet substantial enough to serve a heavy-use attraction like the Islands would be expensive to create and maintain. The wear and tear on vintage equipment in that kind of heavy-duty service would overwhelm the resources of any heritage group I know of.

Places like Tampa run pseudo "heritage" trolleys and Disney runs its antique railways.... but they do it with modern purpose built equipment and full-size transit agency shops.

A couple of Witt cars or PCCs trundling up and down a track on the Islands would be charming and nostalgiac.... until a lineup formed, and then it would be bad news.

- Paul
Then use a modern one made up to look vintage? Doesn't seem that complicated, but I'm just imagining here.
 
Then use a modern one made up to look vintage? Doesn't seem that complicated, but I'm just imagining here.

That's what one would do. i'm sure people (other than transit purists here on UT maybe) would be fine with it.

The issue is, capacity and maintenance infrastructure. It's one thing to run a museum that runs on defined days and offers only the capacity that their attendance requires. It's another to run a service 7 days a week with an inherent promise to meet demand.

The GO/Wego service to Niagara is a good example of what can go wrong when you drop large numbers of people into a distribution network that is much more constrained. An Island trolley service would likely have to deliver at least half-hourly headway from 9 AM to 11 PM.... possibly much more. The arriving load queuing after arriving on one ferry would overwhelm the service. As would the crush when a thunderstorm rolls in and people are desperate for shelter.

The shop and mechanical force needed to keep that many vehicles on the road would be substantial, would need a spare parts inventory and full-time mechanical presence. Would the maintainers and operators be volunteers or paid employees? (I would venture, the latter)

Insurance and liability would be a thorny one. Likely the City would have to backstop a service that is offered to the public as similar to TTC or GO (next time you go to an operating rail or transit museum, read the fine print on the back of your ticket).

Lastly, what would one charge as a fare? Many would expect it to be affordable, especially in the context of a family with grandparents and kids all out for a day.

A museum on the Island charging a substantial fare and thus limiting ridership to those willing to pay, might be sustainable on pure economics. But the tension between whether it's there to be transportation infrastructure for all or just a privately operated attraction would generate a lot of debate, I'm sure.

- Paul
 
If we want to have transit vehicles on the islands that are electric, not a lot of use elsewhere, and soon to be an anachronism that will draw transit fans but not much love otherwise, I suggest transferring the TTC’s Proterra fleet to PF&R and let them contract with someone else to maintain them in a depot on the airport lands. There can be a competition in the city primary schools to come up with a jaunty livery, and then they can all be wrapped with Pizza Pizza advertising anyway.
 
Just get a fleet of these.


Or this, already in use in Canada.

 
Just get a fleet of these.


Or this, already in use in Canada.

Yeah but that doesn’t promote my hater agenda to get Proterra and/or BYD off the TTC fleet list so…
 
At Council today:

MM24.39 - Enhanced Water Taxi Access to Toronto Island - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik​

Motion without Notice
Ward: 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations​

Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to negotiate and enter into licence agreements with private water taxi operators to allow operators to dock at designated locations at Toronto Island Park, for annual terms at market rates based on the existing published rate card with any inflationary or other justified rate adjustments, for the next five years (2025 to 2029), on terms and conditions acceptable to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to undertake discussions with private water taxi operators to understand any barriers related to maximizing water taxi service to and from Toronto Island Park, and to explore options for maximizing water taxi services to and from Toronto Island Park, with any outcomes of those discussions subject to future Council consideration, including any budget requirements.

Summary​

Toronto Island Park is one of Toronto’s top destinations, especially in the summer months,
attracting approximately 1.4 million visitors each year. It is also home to Island residents and
many businesses including marinas, yacht clubs and attractions.

For several years, in addition to the City’s ferry services, privately operated water taxis have
provided passenger transportation services to and from Toronto Island Park. In 2024, five
operators with a total of 53 boats were granted licences to dock at Toronto Island Park
locations. In 2023 (last year available), water taxis transported an estimated 486,066 passengers according to an operator survey conducted by the Waterfront BIA.

Licences are issued annually, expiring each year. Licence opportunities are advertised publicly on the City’s website as business opportunities and are open to any supplier who meets the qualifications. The licence is for use of the City’s docking locations on Toronto Island Park. Licence holders are responsible for securing mainland-side docking locations and infrastructure, and meeting Transport Canada regulations for water taxi service. Licence fees are based on market rates and advertised publicly.

With the growth in demand for water taxi services, the authority to grant licences has exceeded Parks, Forestry and Recreation’s delegated authority under Municipal Code 608 to issue licences. We are recommending Executive Committee adopt a motion to provide the necessary authority, for the next five years, to issue annual licences to qualified water taxi operators. We are bringing the recommendation forward now to ensure a smooth start to the 2025 season in May.

Meanwhile, the City is acquiring two new higher-capacity ferries, currently under construction, to meet increased demand for visiting Toronto Island Park. They are expected to be delivered in late 2026 and early 2027. Prior to the arrival of the new ferries, Parks, Forestry and Recreation has been investing in ways to improve the ferry passenger experience, including improvements and upgrades in 2024, as well as responding to my motion GG14.8 passed at the July 24 and 25, 2024, meeting of City Council. That motion requested the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to explore opportunities to lease or otherwise retain relief vessels to provide additional service to and from Toronto Island while the new ferries are being procured.

As part of this effort, we are recommending Executive Committee also adopt a motion to give further direction to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to undertake
discussions with water taxi operators to understand any barriers related to maximizing water
taxi service to and from Toronto Island Park and to explore options for maximizing water taxi
service. Any outcomes from those discussions would be subject to future Council consideration, including any budget requirements.
 

Back
Top