Architecturefan
Active Member
^^ There's definitely conflicting information when you consider The Star's article and the original committee of adjustment notice. I'm not sure what the Star's source is or why the committee sign had originally read 65 (although I would guess it was done so in error and reflected a previous proposal). In my mind the developer's submission to the committee at 70 stories trumps anything else that would suggest a 65 storey tower.