denfromoakvillemilton
Senior Member
I support the Wellington Street Alignment.
This is an environmental assessment, which as far as I know, has never been done for the line before. When the current work is done, it can move towards construction. Having an environmental assessment means it's basic design, it's the next step up from lines on a map.
A map from Globe and Mail, source is apparently the briefing to city councillors earlier today:
from here: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/a-new-downtown-toronto-subway-map/article28468565/
Hallelujah!
Looks like a Queen St alignment is prevailing. Only thing I'd change is the stop spacing (instead of Sherbourne and Sumach; I'd place stations at Jarvis, Parliament and River). But this is as close to perfection as I can suspect we'll get from the political classes.
Hallelujah!
Looks like a Queen St alignment is prevailing. Only thing I'd change is the stop spacing (instead of Sherbourne and Sumach; I'd place stations at Jarvis, Parliament and River). But this is as close to perfection as I can suspect we'll get from the political classes.
this?
View attachment 65162
I remember thinking at the time if you are going to dip the drl south to Bathurst Yard station and terminate GT (now KW) and Barrie service there, why not terminate Lakeshore West there too?
Also, I thought the whole thinking on ReR was that KW and Stouffville would effectively become one through line....I guess that would not be possible if KW terminated at Bathurst and Stouffville was at Union?
This line is no threat to the streetcar network as a whole. It may eventually replace the Queen car, but that's no reason not to build it. The demands on this corridor are simply too much for a streetcar to handle and if it gets removed at some point in the future it will have served its purpose. Someone said that the streetcar is part of Queen Street's identity but you could have said the same about Bloor, Yonge, and the Danforth. Queen will be fine.I am of two minds about this.
On the one hand, Queen is clearly an excellent place for a subway on most metrics, all things being equal. It should have had one decades ago.
On the other, the bulk of development is so dramatically further south, and I wonder if a Queen route would actually put more pressure on the lower Yonge and University lines as passengers transfer to reach offices along King, Wellington, or below Union. I liked the idea of a Wellington alignment for this reason: far enough south to comprehensively serve the Financial District, but not via Union.
My second concern is the impact on the streetcar network, which could be so much better used and is an intrinsic part of Toronto's identity. It's hard to see the Queen car surviving a (full) DRL along the same street, and it could probably threaten Dundas and King too.
That's not just a nostalgic concern. By the end of the current renewal program for tracks, stops and vehicles, we will have spent many billions setting up the streetcar network for the next 50 years. What happens to that investment?
I suppose this might be a bit alarmist. After all, a full-length DRL is probably decades away. But still...
I just spent a bit of time looking at either side of Queen-Broadview.
All of that says to me that the Queen/Broadview station should not be on Queen. Warning - major wrecking ball crayoning ahead. Apologies to all property owners in the vicinity.
- To my mind, crossing the GO-LSE alignment is madness when origin and terminus are north/west of it, plus the west-east/north-south transition needs a certain curve radius, preferably not minimum (approach to Union?) so as to keep track and wheelset wear in check.
- Digging up Queen for a station east of Broadview severs direct downtown access from Russell and Leslie yards. Let's assume the back route through Commissioners isn't done and widening and railing Leslie to Gerrard isn't either.
- Even if you do dig up Queen, is there room for a station box by the time the tunnel straightens up before impinging on the diamond at Broadview? Doubt it.
- Look at how long fixing the footings at the King side of the streetcar bridge over the Don took. Wanna mess with that again?
Basically, the streetscape along Clark and Thompson is gonna need major revisions to become akin to Strathmore north of Danforth. The tunnel would curve off, under Degrassi to straight up under (or possibly south of) Clark with the station box being constructed under the Thompson Street Parkette, the houses west of it and the parking lot and 4 storey redbrick building west of that, maybe a slice of the street itself too. Major property taking all the way along, but it does not sever Queen at all and minimises disruption to 504. At least the rebuilt Jillys can take the construction pounding right?The TTC's decision not to go ahead with a loop at the TPA lot becomes an advantage at this point since that is available as a staging area assuming the station box won't need to extend into it anyway to give a longer exit tunnel to the Don crossing - would immersed tube work I wonder to allow the station be less deep?
The tunnel would run north of the bridge, under the Richmond Hill line, but then dodge south under the Toronto Humane Society but I have doubts it can successfully avoid all of the Queen/King junction without impacting the rather nice 550 Queen St East at the NW corner of Queen and River. The tunneling would be under Queen from there on, with the next station at Parliament.
Of course, if they had gotten on with DRL years ago, Leslieville property acquisition would have been a lot cheaper!