News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.7K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.5K     0 

I was through Terminal 1 this year and Terminal 3 last year. I much prefer Terminal 3.

I found Terminal 1 to be alot more complicated and sectioned off than Terminal 3 making the whole experience alot less pleasant.
The quality of Terminal 3 highly depends on where you are. If you're doing domestic or international flights, its perfectly adequate and kinda nice.

... The US pre-clearance gates however... oh boy. It is an absolutely claustrophobic mess with pretty much nothing around.
 
I am happy they are going back to the original. Makes for a cleaner design and I would assume a lot of the infrastructure is in place to implement this design easier.
 
I am happy they are going back to the original. Makes for a cleaner design and I would assume a lot of the infrastructure is in place to implement this design easier.
Unfortunately it looks like the big arched roof is going away in the new scheme along with the curves of the original design...

But regardless, airports around North America are getting some big investments in their facilities, and choosing anything less ambitious would have diminished the standing of Pearson IMO.


Portland of course is the new standard for airport architecture in the US IMO:
1734809028842.png
 
So the whole Pearson Union station and new hub east of Airport Road is dead then by the look of it. Or at least pushed off well into the 2040s or 2050s.

So where is Line 5 going to come in? Hopefully there's a way to integrate it into that new extension.
 

Back
Top