innsertnamehere
Superstar
Damn, they handed this off to IBI again. IMO Quad was going a better job. This looks just plain awkward.
Except for the fact that we're talking about housing, and there's a scarcity of housing in the city. Which developers have been actively exploiting, so I dont think people would care much about if the building was red, or orange, etc..It's an investment vehicle. If you're worried about resale value, you don't buy a new BMW in yellow, you buy it in silver, grey or black. Same principle here.
It's an investment vehicle. If you're worried about resale value, you don't buy a new BMW in yellow, you buy it in silver, grey or black. Same principle here.
In a housing crisis, such as this one, it's not those in need purchasing housing. It's the continued exploitation of the working class by those who can afford staggering prices and who can then lease substandard units in boring or downright crappy buildings to those who can barely afford rent.Except for the fact that we're talking about housing, and there's a scarcity of housing in the city. Which developers have been actively exploiting, so I dont think people would care much about if the building was red, or orange, etc..
Clearly there are many people who dont care if they live in/invest in, is the ugliest or cheapest buildings imaginable. If they did, developers like Concord or Marlin Spring wouldnt be in business. My point is, if there are that many people who dont care, would it really hurt to switch things up? Sure your cost of developing will go up very slightly, but it wouldnt be an earth-shattering increase in cost like these developers make it seem like it would be.