If you want total conspiracy theory...

SNC Lavalin that was the key backer of the Blue 22 plan.
SNC has previously accepted a plea bargain finding them guilty of illegal contributions to the Liberal Party.
SNC has accepted that they are guilty of bribing various Quebec municipalities
SNC had a contract to build the Union-Pearson line but somehow was able to exit the contract with no financial penalties.

And guess who organized this chaos? David Collenette
The same person who messed up a 2 km link to the airport was then asked by Wynne to do the HSR study.

What a great choice!!!!!

...maybe for the Liberal party only
Spoken like a true Con Party Apparatchik
SNC had a contract to build the Union-Pearson line but somehow was able to exit the contract with no financial penalties.
There was never a "contract" per-se:
[...]
Transport Canada made a request for proposal for an airport rail link in April 2001. In May 2003, the submissions were pared down to four pre-qualified private consortia, who were then invited to submit business cases. An SNC-Lavalin subsidiary named the Union Pearson AirLink Group was selected as the successful respondent to finance, design, construct, operate and maintain an airport rail link on November 13, 2003.[16] The service was to be called Blue22, as a trip would take 22 minutes to or from Pearson with a stop at the Bloor GO/Dundas West TTC Station. Trains were to be refurbished Budd Rail Diesel Cars, and were expected to begin running between 2008 and 2010.[15]

By 2008, there had not been significant progress on the project because of failed consensus in negotiations, regulatory hurdles and community opposition. In June 2008, the Ontario government revised the environmental assessment process from a required three-year period to six months, and later that summer it resumed negotiations with Union Pearson AirLink Group on terms for a public-private partnership. Furthermore, the high-speed link received public statements of strong support from Premier of Ontario Dalton McGuinty, Toronto Mayor David Miller and the federal government.[17]

In November 2008, Metrolinx, the Ontario government agency for Greater Toronto and Hamilton transportation, released its Regional Transportation Plan titled The Big Move, outlining how an airport rail link was part of a strategy to establish multi-directional high-order transit connectivity to the Pearson Airport district, in addition to the Mississauga Transitway, rapid transit corridors along Highways 427 and 407, and light rail transit lines along Eglinton and Finch Avenues.[14] In December 2008, Metrolinx became the proponent of new EA that would simultaneously assess a combination of both the UP Express and GO Transit's Georgetown South expansion.[18] The final Environmental Project Report was released on July 30, 2009.[14]

Metrolinx takeover
After two years of failed negotiations and financing difficulties, the public-private partnership between Ontario and the Union Pearson AirLink Group was called off in July 2010, and Metrolinx was handed responsibility to directly own and operate the service.[19][20] Metrolinx established the new operating division that would become Union Pearson Express.[21] The name 'Air Rail Link' was used as a placeholder until the official name was unveiled on November 29, 2012.[4]

Metrolinx largely preserved the same project scope as had been approved in the environmental assessment, with the service designed for air travellers rather than for conventional commuters. Changes from SNC Lavalin's former proposal included refinements to take into account synergies with GO Transit.[21] In November 2010, the Board of Directors of Metrolinx authorized its staff to enter into negotiations with Sumitomo Corporation of America to supply Diesel Multiple Units (DMUs); the contract was approved by the Board in February 2011 and executed on 31 March 2011.[22] Kathy Haley was named the first president of the division in July 2011.[23]
[...]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pearson_Express

SNC has previously accepted a plea bargain finding them guilty of illegal contributions to the Liberal Party.

SNC-Lavalin made illegal donations to Liberals, Conservatives from 2004 to 2011

Construction giant enters into deal with elections watchdog after company illegally donated $118,000 between 2004 and 2011.
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...s-in-donations-to-liberals-conservatives.html

Seems the Cons are no better....I'm just so shocked...
 
Last edited:
The federal Liberals (of which Collenette was one) have some overlap with the provincial Liberals but there are definitely those who are either one or other.
 
The federal Liberals (of which Collenette was one) have some overlap with the provincial Liberals but there are definitely those who are either one or other.
The provincial Liberal party in Quebec has nothing to do with the federal Liberal party. And they aren't even politically similar.

The provincial Liberal party (PLQ) was more closely aligned with the federal Progressive-Conservative party - and you can see some that served in both parties, including former PC Deputy Prime Minister Charest who went on to be Premier of Quebec for a decade as PLQ.

More than anything else, PLQ are red tories. Though with the complete lack of red tories in the Conservative party these days, I really don't know what they align with; there's a huge federal hole in that area. I suppose some similarity with the very right wing of the Liberals, like what's his name, who I don't recall his name, and don't care to google it ... the American who wasn't staying, who went to school with Bob Rae ... but some of his crowd have shown up more recently with the Ontario PC party.

SNC-Lavalin bribed everyone - or at least everyone close to power. Liberals, Conservatives, PLQ, PQ, all sorts of local councillors, mayors of all sorts. And also close relations to the mafia and bikers.
 
UPX costs province $11 per ride
New subsidy much lower than air-rail link's first year in operation, transportation minister calls it ‘great news.’


The province is subsidizing rides on the Union Pearson Express (UPX) at much lower levels than it did last year, but it still costs the public about $11 every time a passenger boards the controversial air-rail link.

According to figures that will be presented at the Metrolinx board on Wednesday, it cost the provincial government $62.8 million to operate the train between Union Station and Pearson Airport during the fiscal year that ran from April 2016 to March 2017.

Over the same period, 2.76 million people rode the service. With revenues from fares and other sources totaling $32.4 million, the government provided a subsidy of $30.4 million, or about $11 per rider.

Transportation Minister Steven Del Duca called the new numbers “great news.”

The subsidy is much lower than the $52.25 per ride it cost the government in the 2015-2016 fiscal year.

“I’m delighted to know that we’ve managed to drop the subsidy for the UP Express by 80 per cent year over year.
I think that’s really critical,” the minister said.

Although Metrolinx, the provincial transit agency that operates the UPX, has cast doubt on whether it will be possible for the service to break even under its new fare structure, Del Duca said that remains the goal.

“I think it’s trending the right way, but we definitely have more work to do,” said the minister, who is also the Liberal MPP for Vaughan.

Michael Harris, transportation critic for the Ontario PC party, said the new lower subsidy number is nothing to celebrate.

“Only the Liberals can pat themselves on the back for jacking the subsidy at the beginning and then reducing it down to $11,” he said.

Harris, who is the MPP for Kitchener-Conestoga, argued that Metroolinx should never have ignored warnings that its original fares were too high and that it was a mistake to attempt operate the UPX as a “premium” rail line.

The UPX entered service in June, 2015, and initially charged $27.90 for a trip between the airport and Union, or $19 with a Presto card. Travellers found the price too high and the service failed to attract enough riders.

In March 2016 Metrolinx finally decided to slash the fares to $12, or $9 with a Presto fare card. Ridership has surged since.

In its first 10 months of operation, a little more than 750,000 people rode the line, less than half the number that rode last year.

Aside from additional fare revenue from increased ridership, the UPX has also cashed in on corporate sponsorships.

Revenue from partners like CIBC and Deloitte, which paid for naming and advertising rights, and Mill Street Brewery and the Drake General Store, which rent space at Union Station, made up almost 28 per cent of the service’s revenue.

The Metrolinx board is expected to approve a 3 per cent fare increase to the UPX on Wednesday. It will only affect fares that cost more than $5.65, and won’t apply to shorter trips on the line that don’t make the full trip from Union to the airport.


https://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2017/06/28/upx-costs-province-11-per-ride.html
 

So the total cost is $20 per rider. And just under a 50% recovery ratio. Most suburban bus systems would be killing for this recovery ratio

The times I ride it (mostly during rush hour) there are always a few people standing. So at capacity for a premium ride.

During rush hour should it now be disconnected from the GO pricing? And given it is a premium service to GO the riders should be paying a premium as well? For those at Weston and Bloor we have options to get downtown. An extra rush-hour only premium for Weston and Bloor would slightly reduce the loads at capacity both freeing up room for Airport users and increase the revenue from the remaining users.

Maybe start with $0.50 more than the GO fare?
 
The provincial Liberal party (PLQ) was more closely aligned with the federal Progressive-Conservative party - and you can see some that served in both parties, including former PC Deputy Prime Minister Charest who went on to be Premier of Quebec for a decade as PLQ.

I know it's off-topic, but this is wrong. The PLQ isn't a left-right party, it's just a great big federalist tent. Jean Charest was the PLQ's leader & premier of Quebec, but Tom Mulcair - future NDP leader - was in his Cabinet.
 
So the total cost is $20 per rider. And just under a 50% recovery ratio. Most suburban bus systems would be killing for this recovery ratio

The times I ride it (mostly during rush hour) there are always a few people standing. So at capacity for a premium ride.

During rush hour should it now be disconnected from the GO pricing? And given it is a premium service to GO the riders should be paying a premium as well? For those at Weston and Bloor we have options to get downtown. An extra rush-hour only premium for Weston and Bloor would slightly reduce the loads at capacity both freeing up room for Airport users and increase the revenue from the remaining users.

Maybe start with $0.50 more than the GO fare?

Don't kill the golden goose......drain it. Raise the airport fare by $2. That price point is still far below limo or cab. The current fare is a desperation measure that pushed the pendulum over too far. (What were they doing charging $29, when the cost was $20, anyways?)

The time to address the local fare is when GO gets things sorted out with CN and we have half hourly all day GO service. People will understand a fare increase when that happens. UPE really doesn't want that business at all, but the alternative has to be acceptable before we discourage the local business.

And (I'm crossposting this thought, out of balance) let's see how the revenue from the first year of the 407 extension shapes up against target. $30M subsidy to UPE, versus $?? for 407? Let's put the UPE shortfall in perspective.

- Paul
 
The difference between UPX and GO is that other GO trains don't benefit one entity - GTAA. Surely the province should be pressing the airport to contribute? But who knows what kind of crappy contract Metrolinx and their political masters agreed to when the Pan Am bid had to be finalized.
 
The difference between UPX and GO is that other GO trains don't benefit one entity - GTAA. Surely the province should be pressing the airport to contribute? But who knows what kind of crappy contract Metrolinx and their political masters agreed to when the Pan Am bid had to be finalized.
No, it's the other way around. ML pays GTAA. The contract includes something that includes a surcharge on the fare for lost parking. ML doesn't make the full $9.

http://www.cp24.com/news/up-express...r-parking-revenue-losses-at-pearson-1.1942303
 
(What were they doing charging $29, when the cost was $20, anyways?)
The cost per ride is $20, based on the current ridership.
The theory behind the $29 fare was an assumption of lower ridership, and so requiring a higher fare to make up the gap.
 
Steve Munro has published the latest ridership numbers in a post here.

8000 riders a day is a huge accomplishment. And when I ride the 192 it does not look like the UPX has cannibalized the bus ridership either.
That means there are 8000 fewer people in cars/taxis/limos coming downtown.

But now they have to figure out how to minimize the costs (and maximize revenue) without decreasing the quality of the service. Maybe re-configuring the stations to make the platforms a fare paid area (if I recall HK does this) & only doing spot checks on riders. How about eliminating the service counter at Bloor St and having an automatic Presto Card card dispenser?
 
Maybe re-configuring the stations to make the platforms a fare paid area (if I recall HK does this) & only doing spot checks on riders. How about eliminating the service counter at Bloor St and having an automatic Presto Card card dispenser?

Making the platforms fare paid would not be feasible. It would require the use of faregates which can both scan Presto cards and the QR codes on tickets/phones, and you would need a staff member in case it has trouble scanning a phone screen (this occurs frequently onboard, even today). At Bloor and Weston, GO customers would no longer be able to enter/exit the station from the same place as UPX customers. New elevators would need to be installed to provide accessibility to each service separately, and entire new tunnels and entrances/exits might need to be built. At Union, the only place you could put gates is right at the station entrance, which means say goodbye to public access to the CIBC UPStairs lounge (which is now very busy before/after Jays games, I'm sure their lease stipulated public access and I doubt they'd be willing to cut their customer base down to near zero), as well as Balzacs and the Drake general store; at Union they already have a system in place to check fares prior to boarding during rush hour. At Pearson it might be doable. And for that matter, the TTC faregates are 1) frequently broken, and they frequently fail safe into a stuck open mode allowing free entry, and 2) easily defeated using the umbrella trick or other means.

Faregates would also mean losing the ability to buy tickets onboard. When you're rushing to make a flight and the doors are closing in 10 seconds, you don't have 10 minutes to use a ticket vending machine, you can just hop on and pay $2 extra--this is a valuable amenity for business passengers. Also, it seems a large part of the point of not doing fare checks onboard would be to get rid of the onboard staff--once again, this is unwise due to emergency situations, and for a generally positive customer experience.

Automatic presto card dispensers/load machines are coming to every GO and UPX station's ticket vending machines. I believe some UPX machines at Union and Pearson already have it.

Eliminating the service counter would be extremely unwise given the unreliability and slowness of the reload and ticket vending machines, and the need to be able to answer questions especially from tourists. Keep in mind that largely for safety reasons it's important to try to have a staff member on hand for as much of the day as possible in big stations like this--little GO stations like Aurora, Maple, Rutherford, Gormley, etc. which are just a hut and a strip of concrete can be staffed for minimal hours, but these large stations with lots of tunnels, elevators, and stairs, and frequent service, emergency situations are more likely to arise. And if you want to add faregates, someone needs to be there in case of issues with them.
 
Making the platforms fare paid would not be feasible. It would require the use of faregates which can both scan Presto cards and the QR codes on tickets/phones,....

These faregates exist, even in the Presto realm. Ottawa is getting the same faregate as is being installed on the Toronto subway system, but with an additional QR scanner for single-use tickets.

Dan
Toronto, Ont.
 

Back
Top