nfitz
Superstar
As far as I know, I have. But with over 2,000 posts in this thread, many off-topic, perhaps I've missed something ... and if so, that is no justification for your incivilityIf you're not going to read posts in the context of the thread, just don't respond. It's that simple.
Yes, I read that. It was repeated in the post I quoted.LAz said "1) this planning seemed to impose that there will be LRT [on Sheppard]." An LRT line was decided upon before a study, not recommended after a study. It's not a secret and no one was surprised by the EA's outcome.
Of course I read it. My gosh, if you lie about this, what else have you lied about?This is all in the post you quoted without reading.
Other EAs that were completed early have seen changes. The piece of Scarborough-Malvern north of Sheppard was removed, and that line was shifted to get closer to UT Scarborough. My comment stands. It's a plan on where to stick LRT. We have seen evolution.Lines like Jane may end up being built differently or not at all but since the money ran out only 3/7 of the way through the plan, we can't know right now.
I really object to you resorting to lies to try and make your point. It's out of line and chlidlish.