|
|
|
More frequent service from Brantford to St Catharines to promote Hamilton as a secondary hub in its own right?why would there be?
Anything with an origin/destination in Toronto would be far higher than Brantford, which is the only differentiating population centre between the two potential routes.
6TPH is not gonna happen- least of all here with the track use challenges. The demand also definetely does not exist, and that’s as a massive Hamilton booster.I wonder if there is the ridership for a more frequent GO service along Niagara through Hamilton and then goes west to Brantford.
Obviously no need for 6 trains per hour from Union to Niagara Falls, but maybe there is potential for 6 trains per hour from Hamilton to St Catharines?
View attachment 515739
Obviously true, but I’d think you’d appreciate the notion of a Hamilton-oriented commuter rail line. Tone the scope down a bit to 1-3tph as a DMU service and we might be cooking. Any version of this would require more stops than exist currently however, and customers would need to know that they can transfer to LSW in Hamilton to continue to Toronto if they please. You can likely tap into a significant market merely by offering rail access in Niagara when it isn’t otherwise available (off peak, etc) - even if it requires a transfer.why would there be?
Anything with an origin/destination in Toronto would be far higher than Brantford, which is the only differentiating population centre between the two potential routes.
In my ideal world, Hamilton would become a bigger regional presence if the province and the feds embraced the "friendshoring" that the US wants to do, and SW Ontario can start hosting various semiconductor, electronics and EV manufacturing.6TPH is not gonna happen- least of all here with the track use challenges. The demand also definetely does not exist, and that’s as a massive Hamilton booster.
Making the city a secondary GO hub is not a bad idea, if not solely because Hamilton’s railways were built to go to Hamilton, not Toronto, so there’s opportunities to better serve communities with GO by terminating there instead of giving up because the route to Toronto is indirect.
Obviously true, but I’d think you’d appreciate the notion of a Hamilton-oriented commuter rail line. Tone the scope down a bit to 1-3tph as a DMU service and we might be cooking. Any version of this would require more stops than exist currently however, and customers would need to know that they can transfer to LSW in Hamilton to continue to Toronto if they please. You can likely tap into a significant market merely by offering rail access in Niagara when it isn’t otherwise available (off peak, etc) - even if it requires a transfer.
In any case, while I might want to see it, for Hamilton to become a secondary hub to Toronto would require thorough planning effort from the city coordinated with the province. You are fighting the tide; it can be done, but without effort the region will continue the status quo and subsume Hamilton.
When all is said and done, the city is geographically advantaged towards a bigger regional presence. Somehow that needs to be realized; only then can rails play a part.
Yes, don't steal the thunder from political announcements... it is top secret were UP will stop and whether or not Stouffville line has the capacity with increase service to be able to handle additional stops.Two very similar maps, the white circles aren't a mistake on the second map, it just has stuff I’m not allowed to share! All of it is removed in the first map.
That doesn't sound like it will be news we will be excited about then. Eyes will roll perhaps.The reason something is censored there is not because of the Stouffville line