I'm not sure how he's doing there, but my point was UT obsesses over the politician-type CEO candidates (Giambrone, Colle)
I think, if you're fair, most UT'ers are not in the transit industry and don't know players who aren't high profile. UT'ers discuss the candidates (or apparent candidates) of whom they are aware.
I myself am not in the industry, I am a reasonably keen TTC follower and somewhat knowledgeable from a distance, as a lay person about the broader sector.
But i would rely on those to whom I talk, in the industry, to get a feel for who may, or who should be, in the running.
When I'm given such info, I share, if I've been told I can; but in some cases, there's a desire to keep that quiet, for now, understandably, because most potential candidates are gainfully employed elsewhere, and don't want their employer tipped off on a potential exit.
when there are likely dozens of CEO-type CEO candidates out there that you would know from being in the industry. As
@RapidTransit mentioned, a few at the TTC included - although Leary caused a lot of the best upper management to pack up and find new jobs.
Dozens seems a bit ambitious. But you may know better than I. I would tend to think you would want a candidate with experience running a subway/metro, typically, and one with experience with a large'ish system, and then a solid rep for getting (good) things done.
I'm sure the list is quite deep if you consider any candidate w/the above experience, but if you add fluent in English and willing to relocate to Toronto, I expect the list is a bit smaller.
FWIW, for interim CEO, to my understanding, only 3 people were interviewed. Now, that's a much less attractive offer than the permanent job..........