nfitz
Superstar
One that's near capacity, and can't handle extra capacity through the busiest section.If you need to bypass the main interchange because of an unsafe level of overcrowding, just what kind of transit system are you operating?
Good question. I was surprised by the choice of a central platform. There were other options - such as staggering the two platforms (one north of Eglinton, one south, with a bit of overlap if necessary - though if they eliminate the third track north of the station, there should be enough room for an entire new platform)). And if they really couldn't squeeze in a second platform anywhere, then you could be really radical and build a new southbound tunnel under Duplex and put one (or two) platforms there. There's nothing to say platforms or tunnels have to be together.So someone explain to me how the heck Eglinton Station is going to handle the crush load of Bloor-Yonge, especially on days like this morning, with a shared central platform that is 1/3 the size of Bloor-Yonge's platform?????
I suppose the question is, is how many of those people currently crowding the platform, will simply be using the LRT, and will still be there.Transfer demand at Eglinton should be about a quarter the demand at Bloor, however the Eglinton Station platforms are already very crowded as is.
However, what's the long-term plan. Though I guess not much precludes building a new platform later on.
Here's an example of a staggered platform - Oval station on the Northern line in London. There are other examples in New York City.