News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
Oh frick! Another 10-year conversion incoming.


  • Barron Building (610 8th Ave. SW, Calgary) – Targeting Spring 2026 completion with 124 high end rentals;
  • One01 (101 6th Ave. SW, Calgary) – The former Hanover office tower in downtown Calgary has been renamed and will have 314 residential suites with expected occupancy in November
 
Last edited:
Oh frick! Another 10-year conversion incoming.


  • Barron Building (610 8th Ave. SW, Calgary) – Targeting Spring 2026 completion with 124 high end rentals;
  • One01 (101 6th Ave. SW, Calgary) – The former Hanover office tower in downtown Calgary has been renamed and will have 314 residential suites with expected occupancy in November
To be fair, they've been at a good pace with their Hannover conversion. I am excited to see how much the thousands of new housing units in these various conversions will impact the vibrancy of the downtown core over the next few years. For example, the Hannover conversion, when considered in addition to the residential portion of Telus Sky, likely means 1000 or more new residents on that block. We always get roasted for downtown being quiet after 5 pm (unfairly, IMO, because that also describes just about every other large North American city).

This also helps explain why we don't have a lot of residential highrises u/c (at least compared to Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa and Vancouver) because all these conversions represent a thousand or so units, at least, on top of all the towers Truman and others are building.
 
Last edited:
Oh frick! Another 10-year conversion incoming.


  • Barron Building (610 8th Ave. SW, Calgary) – Targeting Spring 2026 completion with 124 high end rentals;
  • One01 (101 6th Ave. SW, Calgary) – The former Hanover office tower in downtown Calgary has been renamed and will have 314 residential suites with expected occupancy in November
The title to that article definitely gave me a scare. What fool calls an acquired building downtown a Calgary tower?
 
To be fair, they've been at a good pace with their Hannover conversion. I am excited to see how much the thousands of new housing units in these various conversions will impact the vibrancy of the downtown core over the next few years. For example, the Hannover conversion, when considered in addition to the residential portion of Telus Sky, likely means 1000 or more new residents on that block. We always get roasted for downtown being quiet after 5 pm (unfairly, IMO, because that also describes just about every other large North American city).

This also helps explain why we don't have a lot of residential highrises u/c (at least compared to Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa and Vancouver) because all these conversions represent a thousand or so units, at least, on top of all the towers Truman and others are building.
Downtown and rail side of the Beltline have lots of new builds going on right now. There probably 1/2 dozen new builds going right now plus the 20+ conversions. On top of all the new stuff soon to start in the pipeline. We’ll never be Vancouver or Toronto because unlike those cities we have pretty much unlimited greenfield builds. The 40,000 units Calgary built last year can’t be touched by any other city (especially comparing city sizes).
 
  • An amendment to the Mission Area Redevelopment Plan is required to increase the maximum density from 395 units per hectare to 463 units per hectare.
Wasn't the Area Redevelopment Plan just superseded with the new West Elbow Local Area Plan 3 months ago? I'm curious if council will have an appetite to modify a brand new plan that took a year and a half to get through.
 
There's something similar to this in Legacy, minus the angled parking and boulevard. Using the cars parking along the side you could very realistically see how this could be a six-lane road or four driving lanes and two parking lanes.

View attachment 670412
This is one of these streets where the sized to fit every possible need (except street trees), including street parking. Then they put front driveway homes on it, removing the ability for 95% of the street parking to occur in reality.

So there's a few million dollars of extra asphalt, no trees, ironically no parking and higher than needed liabilities in perpetuity for ever each time this road is repaved for the next 100 years. Plus it will inevitably lead to speeding and traffic calming issues, hopefully there aren't too many deaths or injuries here in the next 100 years.

Great work everyone!
 
This is one of these streets where the sized to fit every possible need (except street trees), including street parking. Then they put front driveway homes on it, removing the ability for 95% of the street parking to occur in reality.

So there's a few million dollars of extra asphalt, no trees, ironically no parking and higher than needed liabilities in perpetuity for ever each time this road is repaved for the next 100 years. Plus it will inevitably lead to speeding and traffic calming issues, hopefully there aren't too many deaths or injuries here in the next 100 years.

Great work everyone!
There is also the challenge with that Legacy and Corrnerstone example of the fact that the carriageway (the asphalt) is supposed to contain painted on-street bike lanes in each direction, complete with a buffer zone, per the City's approved Complete Streets Policy and design guidelines for subdivision servicing. However, the City's operating department just, doesn't bother to do it. Not sure why. Also not sure why it isn't corrected (it is Council policy after all).

When there is enough complaints about the speed of the road though, they WILL take action, and enshrine the angled parking with signage:
 
There's something similar to this in Legacy, minus the angled parking and boulevard. Using the cars parking along the side you could very realistically see how this could be a six-lane road or four driving lanes and two parking lanes.

View attachment 670412
I drive down that road every day to get home. It blows my mind every time.
 
When your houses are ultra close to your neighbour’s you want your cars to at least feel like they can stretch out a little.

IMG_4917.jpeg
 

Back
Top