On this, and kind of beyond it. The city seems to be tired of Balzac getting all the industrial growth.
I find the industrial growth discussion fascinating in it doesn't get as much attention as the mixed use and residential stuff. I always wondered if this is really a problem to lose industrial market share to Rockyview and, more importantly, is there anything we can actually do about it?
A bunch of random thoughts:
Regardless of where growth goes in the region, there's benefits for Calgary through the jobs. Incomes generated in Balzac are spend in Calgary mostly, as that's where the workforce lives. Yes, it's not ideal to create car-dependence industrial sprawl, but it's a tall-order to reverse this - warehouses are enormous and not particularly job-dense. In North America they thrive on cheap land (largely rural) and access to market (highways) that's a structural advantage of rural development that is hard to overcome in urban settings.
Of course, if we don't get industrial growth we don't get the industrial tax base which everyone loves because they can't vote and have to pay a higher rate than residential uses - so I see the incentive to get more within the city boundary. Rockyview for it's part would have probably gone bankrupt had they not pivoted to industrial growth to offset their expensive and inefficient residential land pattern.
So we want industrial growth in the boundary, but the question becomes if we can actually influence this stuff. Balzac first exploded due to Calgary (and Alberta) growth and industrial land constraints in Vancouver, neither of which are really driven by local policy. Given urban land prices, it's hard to imagine an Amazon warehouse setting up in an established industrial area due to the size they need. Could Calgary incentives ever outweigh the relative affordability of land in rural areas?
A better question might be why would we want to incentivize mega-warehouses in the first place? It's not like older "obsolete" industrial areas are declining in Calgary, if anything they are thriving more than ever, with an evolving, denser mix of commercial/industrial uses like breweries and any number of random companies that need centrally located spaces. This ecosystem thrives in the conditions that Calgary excels at relative to the county - sufficient local density, immediate access to customers, and quality urban services. I imagine the tax-density of Manchester is much higher per hectare than an Amazon warehouse in Rockyview? Surely part of hte goal is to create more Manchesters, not just more Balzacs?
Lastly - does anything we do actually matter here? Has any central city ever actually preserved it's industrial base given regional competition with cheaper land? Apart from fixed critical infrastructure (e.g. a port) that can't move, to my knowledge at a certain size every major city sheds industrial space to the cheaper areas around all over North America. Has anyone ever reversed this trend?