[micheal_can]

Are you really comparing the 7.5 hour ride from Chicago to St. Paul, with the 32 hour ride from Edmonton to Vancouver? That's like adding an extra train from Denver to San Francisco, and even then at least that service runs through major cities like Salt Lake City and Reno...

Notice how you do not go from NYC to Seattle on the Empire Builder? Maybe the same should happen with the Canadian.

 

[ARG1]

Notice how you do not go from NYC to Seattle on the Empire Builder? Maybe the same should happen with the Canadian.

I didn't say anything about NYC to Seattle, I'm specifically talking about your idea of Edmonton to Vancouver. I think you're severely underestimating how long it takes to get between these cities...

 

[micheal_can]

I didn't say anything about NYC to Seattle, I'm specifically talking about your idea of Edmonton to Vancouver. I think you're severely underestimating how long it takes to get between these cities...

That section is already being run by a train. That is why I mentioned it.

 

[livesquid]

Toronto to Montreal in 3 hours? Canada might be finally ready to build a high speed rail line — but how fast it will be remains an open question

In the coming weeks, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet is expected to choose which of three groups of private companies will get to help design and build a new passenger

www.thestar.com

 

[Urban Sky]

Toronto to Montreal in 3 hours? Canada might be finally ready to build a high speed rail line — but how fast it will be remains an open question

In the coming weeks, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet is expected to choose which of three groups of private companies will get to help design and build a new passenger

www.thestar.com

This is actually a really good article providing a good overview over what is known about the project at the moment!

 

[Urban Sky]

The federal parliament’s Transport Committee has released the transcripts about the ten-hour delay of train 622 on August 31:

Evidence - TRAN (44-1) - No. 126 - House of Commons of Canada

Evidence - TRAN (44-1) - No. 126 - House of Commons of Canada

www.ourcommons.ca

@nfitz will be surprised to learn that they contacted 10 bus companies and none had buses available…

 

[nfitz]

@nfitz will be surprised to learn that they contacted 10 bus companies and none had buses available…

I believe that something similar was widely reported.

I never said they should contact bus companies. But that they should do what they used to do, and contract bus companies in advance.

 

[Towered]

Toronto to Montreal in 3 hours? Canada might be finally ready to build a high speed rail line — but how fast it will be remains an open question

In the coming weeks, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet is expected to choose which of three groups of private companies will get to help design and build a new passenger

www.thestar.com

Please - how long have successive governments sat on this proposed line? Why would now be suddenly different?

 

[crs1026]

Please - how long have successive governments sat on this proposed line? Why would now be suddenly different?

Ask Rick Mercer. The more recent serious proposal mileatones were VIA Fast, somewhat actioned during the Harper government in 2008-2010, and then the VIA HFR proposal which was first announced in 2014, revised in 2015, and first reached the Trudeau Cabinet in 2017.

PS - What is different this time? Driving times have increased thanks to congestion in the GTA and west Montreal, air terminals are closer to capacity, population is growing, and climate change is being taken more seriously. Of course, costs keep escalating so sticker shock just keeps growing.

- Paul

 

[Towered]

Ask Rick Mercer. The more recent serious proposal mileatones were VIA Fast, somewhat actioned during the Harper government in 2008-2010, and then the VIA HFR proposal which was first announced in 2014, revised in 2015, and first reached the Trudeau Cabinet in 2017.

- Paul

My point precisely.

 

[innsertnamehere]

Please - how long have successive governments sat on this proposed line? Why would now be suddenly different?

I understand the malaise - but the current intention is to sign a hard contract with the contractor some time early next year. After that the government is "locked in" and would start spending real money on it.

 

[Urban Sky]

I understand the malaise - but the current intention is to sign a hard contract with the contractor some time early next year. After that the government is "locked in" and would start spending real money on it.

Since the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway, no intercity passenger rail project has ever received as much government attention and money as HFR. Progress is slow, with design and construction expected to take another 12 years (if I recall the Toronto Star article correctly), but that is in line with planning and construction times in Europe:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1550675830564601857

For reference purposes, we have entered the design phase only this year with the RFP submissions…

 

[Towered]

I understand the malaise - but the current intention is to sign a hard contract with the contractor some time early next year. After that the government is "locked in" and would start spending real money on it.

If the government changes as we all predict, will it still be locked in?

 

[Urban Sky]

I believe that something similar was widely reported.

I never said they should contact bus companies. But that they should do what they used to do, and contract bus companies in advance.

Given the current state of the bus industry, I believe that it would be better value-for-money to assign the responsibility for evacuating stranded trains in (with the available means) inaccessible areas to a civic emergency-response unit, as that way a much more efficient use of the capabilities can be ensured than paying g private companies to acquire buses and hire drivers at multiple locations for what is (for each such location) less-than-annual events…

 

[Urban Sky]

I understand the malaise - but the current intention is to sign a hard contract with the contractor some time early next year. After that the government is "locked in" and would start spending real money on it.

If the government changes as we all predict, will it still be locked in?

The selection of the preferred proponent only marks the beginning of the “co-development phase”…

… which is expected to take years before there is the final decision of the federal government, i.e., way past the next election:

Timeline​

While there is no explicit timetable for completion of the High Frequency Rail project, nor for when construction would even begin, Mr. Imbleau stated that he expects the co-development process (during which VIA HFR and the co-developer will establish the details of the eventual project) to take “a couple of years” before the government and the co-developer make a final investment decision. He also told the Committee that VIA HFR’s mandate “is to take adequate time and apply the right resources to pin down the right scope for Canadians and ensure that what we build is at the right cost and is affordable but is also economical for the future.”

Committee Report No. 18 - TRAN (44-1) - House of Commons of Canada

Committee Report No. 18 - TRAN (44-1) - House of Commons of Canada

www.ourcommons.ca