News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
 9.4K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
 5.3K     0 

micheal_can said:
We should ensure that all communities, regardless of who lives there has safe water.

You can train people for the operation and maintenance, but the problem with those contracts is they tend to not want to do that as the companies don't get more money.The military owns water treatment plants that can fin on an airplane and can be put anywhere in the world and make safe drinking water.
Click to expand...
Yes we should. I don't want to spin this thread of more than it has, but the issues on remote FNTs are not impossible, but extremely expensive, to solve. I won't apologize for the snail's pace of progress/rectification by this government or any of its predecessors but, as always, there are often many sides to many stories.

I've been to Cat Lake, and many others like it, many times, but many years ago. By the looks of the photos in the article, not much has changed.

Regarding water systems, once a system is installed, the goal is to have local community members trained to operate them. Repairs are another issue. A CAF 'DART' system isn't the answer; it requires active operators and isn't designed for a distributed system; point-of-use only.
 
Admiral Beez said:
Why are VIA at Sudbury and Sudbury Junction not connected?
Click to expand...
To volunteer just five reasons:
1) because there is no direct track connection between the two stations without at least one change of direction
2) because the timetables for both services don‘t allow for sensible connections between the SUDB-WHTR service and the Canadian
3) because barely anyone transfers between the two services
4) because even if the SUDB-WHTR train was extended to Sudbury Junction, a taxi would be at least 30 minutes faster
5) because there is no funding to provide a service extension which would create virtually zero additional revenues
 
Last edited:
Urban Sky said:
To volunteer just five reasons:
1) because there is no direct track connection between the two stations without at least one change of direction
2) because the timetables for both services don‘t allow for sensible connections between the SUDB-WHTR service and the Canadian
3) because barely anyone transfers between the two services
4) because even if the SUDB-WHTR train was extended to Sudbury Junction, a taxi would be at least 30 minutes faster
5) because there is no funding to provide a service extension which would create virtually zero additional revenues
Click to expand...
You forgot:

They are on 2 different railroad lines. One is CP and the other is CN. Although they share connections, there is not a direct way to connect to the 2.
 
Jeff Morgan said:
On the TRTO->WDON right now. I’m shocked at how rough the ride is. It’s like being on a plan with constant turbulence. Makes it obvious how far we have to go in order to be ready form HSR.
Click to expand...
Are you in one of the HEP cars? It's mostly the trains. I find the LRC to be much better ride. The Siemens are apparently even better.

The old HEPs seem to have really bad shocks, or whatever you call it on a train.
 
micheal_can said:
You forgot:

They are on 2 different railroad lines. One is CP and the other is CN. Although they share connections, there is not a direct way to connect to the 2.
Click to expand...
I suppose my better question would be, why does Sudbury have two train stations located a mere 9km apart? Your post above explains this.

maps.app.goo.gl

Sudbury to Sudbury Jct

maps.app.goo.gl maps.app.goo.gl
 
Last edited:
robmausser said:
Are you in one of the HEP cars? It's mostly the trains. I find the LRC to be much better ride. The Siemens are apparently even better.

The old HEPs seem to have really bad shocks, or whatever you call it on a train.
Click to expand...
They do use shocks, and just like in a car they can wear out. As can the bushings, bearings, linkages, pivots, etc.

The HEP cars are going through a servicing program, one of the parts of which is a rebuild of the trucks. There is a very, very substantial difference in ride quality when comparing the before and after. For the record, this is also the case for the LRC cars as well, although there are far fewer of them running around out there on fresh trucks due to their impending retirement.

Dan
 
Admiral Beez said:
I suppose my better question would be, why does Sudbury have two train stations located a mere 9km apart? Your post above explains this.

maps.app.goo.gl

Sudbury to Sudbury Jct

maps.app.goo.gl maps.app.goo.gl
Click to expand...
Unlike places like Toronto or Winnipeg, The stations in Sudbury were located on the different lines. The downtown station was where the CP's Canadian would go to. Sudbury Junction and Capreol are where the current Canadian goes through. Kinda like how Vancouver and Montreal have 2 major stations.If the rail companies or Via had money to burn, they could make it so that the downtown station could be used for all and no need for backing in or out. We have a better chance of HSR to Sudbury than this changing.
 
With all the rumours of #651 returning in some form or another soon, I was casually browsing schedules tonight and noticed that a #641 has been added to Ottawa - Kingston - Toronto schedule effective May 27.

This trip is slated to depart Ottawa at 04:19 Monday-Thursday only and arrive in Toronto at 08:48, stopping at Fallowfield, Smiths Falls, Brockville, Kingston, Belleville, Cobourg, and Port Hope.

Train Schedule: Ottawa - Kingston - Toronto | VIA Rail

Plan your trip with VIA Rail and find out the train schedules between Ottawa - Kingston - Toronto.
www.viarail.ca www.viarail.ca

Strangely, I’ve been unable to find any official announcement regarding this as I thought it would be a big deal.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top