News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 

How should Toronto connect the East and West arms of the planned waterfront transit with downtown?

  • Expand the existing Union loop

    Votes: 234 70.7%
  • Build a Western terminus

    Votes: 17 5.1%
  • Route service along Queen's Quay with pedestrian/cycle/bus connection to Union

    Votes: 36 10.9%
  • Connect using existing Queen's Quay/Union Loop and via King Street

    Votes: 26 7.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 18 5.4%

  • Total voters
    331
I had hoped that the Executive Committee would get the promised update at its April meeting but, apparently, not. Here is what was asked of Staff in November 2025. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.TTC10.4

6. City Council direct the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, in consultation with relevant City Divisions, the Toronto Transit Commission and Waterfront Toronto, to report back to City Council in first quarter of 2026 with updates on:

a. the completion of 60 percent detailed design progress for Segments 2, 3 and Early Works, including on the cost estimate and funding requests, as required;​
b. Phasing and Delivery Plan, including assessing opportunities for early phase transit improvements and for advancing Segment 1 through design and to procurement;​
c. recommended property acquisitions, as required;​
d. project coordination with major interfacing projects, including the Inner Harbour West Tunnel, Gardiner-Lake Shore East Realignment Project, Hydro One Cherry Street Bridge and Cherry Street Signal Tower;​
e. design advancement of the Queens Quay East Extension, relating to project coordination with the Gardiner-Lake Shore East Realignment project;​
f. Traffic Management Plan; and​
g. intergovernmental discussions including the Canada Public Transit Fund.​

As you know, but for others, this was due in March.............one month slippage is bad.....but two?
 
I had hoped that the Executive Committee would get the promised update at its April meeting but, apparently, not.

Does anybody have insight into why this was delayed? The funding commitment will surely have impact over the coming months, but it would still be great to keep council and the public updated on the current state of planning.
 
Does anybody have insight into why this was delayed? The funding commitment will surely have impact over the coming months, but it would still be great to keep council and the public updated on the current state of planning.
There are probably two possible reasons:

1. The funds just received from the Feds will allow things to ''get going' and the Report was delayed until May so it could be more up-to-date OR
2. The TTC and other Staff were slower than planned in writing it.
 
There are probably two possible reasons:

1. The funds just received from the Feds will allow things to ''get going' and the Report was delayed until May so it could be more up-to-date OR
2. The TTC and other Staff were slower than planned in writing it.
Let's hope it's the first.
 

Back
Top