Midtown Urbanist
Superstar
There is nothing wrong with just having one line, either.
|
|
|
KW is the smallest city in North America to have a light rail line. Even the extension to Cambridge is rather overkill if you ask me.. two lines would be a long, long way off.
So, this is almost like the O-Train?
What? No. Are you trolling?
More stops. More vehicles. Significantly more riders. This is more like the Confederation Line.
What I mean is that this is all this area will see for the forcible future.
The O-Train started in 2001. So, it is 15 years since it started. Confederation line will not open for revenue service in 2018.
So, what I mean is that it will likely not be expanded for a really long time due to the fact that there is no real need for any future extensions.
Really, I am trying to understand why it is building the line when most others are not willing to. The population of RM of Waterloo is about 500,000
Really, I am trying to understand why it is building the line when most others are not willing to. The population of RM of Waterloo is about 500,000
KW is the smallest city in North America to have a light rail line. Even the extension to Cambridge is rather overkill if you ask me.. two lines would be a long, long way off.
According to the 2011 census, the former City of York (now amalgamated into Toronto) had a population of 133,361. Yet they are building an underground LRT, with seven stations, from Mount Dennis Station to Forest Hill Station and continuing east into some former city named "Toronto".
Even a former borough, named "East York", with a 2011 census population of 115,365, is getting an underground LRT from Leaside Station to Laird Station (two stations) and an open stop at Sunnybrook Park.
So why shouldn't Kitchener/Waterloo get a LRT?
(BTW. The City of London England has a population of 7,375. I understand they might have some sort of underground railway as well.)