TransitBart
Senior Member
There is nothing wrong with just having one line, either.
One COMPLETE and FUNDED line is one more than Toronto has today. Good on these folks for taking the plunge.
|
|
|
There is nothing wrong with just having one line, either.
so you missed what I meant when I said "equivalent to" above, i.e. that I know that Euro 95 is roughly the same as US 91? But what do I know, I only filled my car with it for a decade or more...It is not due to crappy gas, you are mixing octane ratings in North America and Europe: here we calculate it differently (average of RON and MON) than in Europe (RON). So, Our 87 octane corrresponds to 91 in Europe.
oops, was a bit slow to reply..
If we're talking about potential future lines, personally I think one of the more interesting possibilities is a tram-train line from downtown Kitchener along Victoria St / old Highway 7 to Guelph and the University of Guelph. It would connect a lot of employment lands and land ripe for redevelopment in both cities. On the urban portions, the four car lanes will be easy to reduce after the new Highway 7 opens, and on the rural portion it can run very fast on a separate right of way.
I think the smarter option would be an EMU shuttle run by GO--seems to make much more sense than constructing an entirely separate line where one already exists and just needs an additional track and electrification, which are already planned anyways.
That said, I'd love to see that service, and I think many KW and Guelph residents would as well. The current lack of fast, reliable, direct transit between the two cities right next to each other seems rather absurd.
So, GO intercity service would be very welcome, and there's existing efforts to make that happen. But in my suggestion I'm not talking about a downtown-to-downtown connection, I'm talking instead about all the stuff in between that needs local transit. Victoria Street North in Kitchener, Woodlawn Road in Guelph, Woolwich St, etc. Those are existing transit corridors that would be much stronger if they were linked together across municipal boundaries.
Octane has no bearing on gas quality. If your cars engine requires 87 octane, using anything above 87 octane will have 0 effect on your engine and car. My father worked for one of the biggest Oil Refining companies in Canada for 15 years as a top manager; and those are his words not mine.
As a car gets older the carbon buildup inside the engine may cause pinging. Using higher octane fuel will help reduce this once....so unless the owner manual stipulates a higher octane level it is only worthwhile on older cars that ping (>5 years)
I think the smarter option would be an EMU shuttle run by GO--seems to make much more sense than constructing an entirely separate line where one already exists and just needs an additional track and electrification, which are already planned anyways.
That said, I'd love to see that service, and I think many KW and Guelph residents would as well. The current lack of fast, reliable, direct transit between the two cities right next to each other seems rather absurd.
As a car gets older the carbon buildup inside the engine may cause pinging. Using higher octane fuel will help reduce this once....so unless the owner manual stipulates a higher octane level it is only worthwhile on older cars that ping (>5 years)
Good to see media coverage beginning on the new bylaws and their enforcement:
http://www.therecord.com/news-story/7053847-fines-towing-bills-for-those-who-park-on-lrt-tracks/
This sounds fine. Ok.
But really? Who parks on train tracks? F**ck, sometimes people can be stupid.
I get that it's not in service yet. But I doubt I'd feel entitled enough to just park there. But my Dad would. :-(