News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.1K     0 

In the Toronto Star:

By DAVID RIDER City Hall Bureau Chief
Mon., Feb. 26, 2018

The battle over bike lanes on north Yonge St. returns to city hall Tuesday with a new proposal one city councillor calls a “compromise” and another calls “nonsense.”
Public works committee will debate the “Reimagining Yonge” proposal that would replace two lanes of vehicle traffic with protected bike lanes on Yonge between Sheppard and Finch Aves. The $51.1-million plan advocated by city transportation staff would create wider boulevards, better pedestrian crossings, and a landscaped centre median aimed at bringing more vitality and safety to a stretch flanked by an ever-growing forest of condominium towers.
Between January 2010 and December 2017, that stretch of Yonge saw 78 collisions involving pedestrians and five involving cyclists. Eight of those people were seriously injured or killed.
Councillor John Filion, whose Willowdale ward encompasses most of the stretch, is championing the plan he says will transform north Yonge from a “six-lane highway” for York Region commuters into a vibrant street for 80,000 local residents.
But Mayor John Tory won’t support that plan, arguing it will increase congestion. He wants to leave the six vehicle lanes and put the bike lanes on nearby Beecroft Rd. — a change city staff say would cost an extra $20 million and leave scant room for sidewalk improvements.
Councillor David Shiner told the Star he will table a “compromise” plan. It would keep the six vehicle lanes but narrow four of them, freeing up sidewalk improvement space. It would extend the proposed Beecroft bike lane north to Finch Ave. and cut through a TTC parking lot to join new bike lanes on Willowdale Ave.
Shiner (Ward 24) said his proposal would add only $7 million to the original cost, take advantage of deeper sidewalk setbacks required for redeveloped properties and, he believes, win the support of transportation staff.
“The plan supports bike lanes and the vehicle capacity of Yonge St. with enhanced boulevards and pedestrian realm,” he said. “We’re providing a better cycle plan.”
Filion calls that “nonsense. It’s trying to put a fancy bow around leaving Yonge St. essentially the way it is except with new concrete,” said Filion (Ward 23), adding city staff comments to him suggest narrowing vehicle lanes would free up very little sidewalk space.
“Nobody wants a bike lane on Beecroft other than perhaps David Shiner,” Filion said. “The cycling community, my residents, city builders, safety advocates — they all want to remove (vehicle) lanes on Yonge St.”
Toronto’s chief medical officer of health, Dr. Eileen de Villa, was asked to weigh the benefits of the tabled options, which did not include Shiner’s version.
In a report released Monday, de Villa said both the staff-preferred Yonge St. bike lane option and the Beecroft bike lanes would provide residents “safe active travel and improved walkability.” However, she said it is “difficult to predict” which plan would provide better health benefits.
 
Shiner's - Keeping all 6 lanes on Yonge but with "lane narrowing" (3.2m travel lanes and 3.3m curb/TTC lane) will generate 1.0m of extra sidewalk width for each side of Yonge Street throughout North York Centre.
Filion's - "Transform Yonge" (4 lanes and CycleTracks) option only get 0.3m of extra sidewalk width for each side of Yonge Street throughout North York Centre. Can't even fit patio tray on 0.3m let alone Patio!

BTW, here we go,... west-side Beecroft!
 
Last edited:
Toronto Sun
By Sue-Ann Levy Feb. 27

The highly controversial Yonge St. bike lane proposal is expected to be nixed in favour of a parallel route when it returns to public works committee Tuesday.
Councillor Steven Holyday, who sits on public works, said Monday he can’t support a project that calls for removing lanes on Yonge St. — north of Sheppard — as proposed in the Reimagining Yonge plan.
“There’s a lot of condemnation about doing this,” he said. “It’s (the area is) already a bottleneck.”
The $51-million option — a pet project of well-past-his-due-date NDP Councillor John Filion — proposes not just repaving Yonge St. but removing two lanes of traffic, from Sheppard to Finch Aves., to accommodate cycle tracks, wider sidewalks, new trees, street furniture and planters.
A second alternative — studied in the fall of last year as part of a $2-million environmental assessment — proposes putting the bike lanes on neighbouring Beecroft Rd. instead. It has a $71-million pricetag.
Holyday said the second alternative appears to “make sense” except for its cost — an extra $20 million.
He said he understands that the acquisition of property that forms a significant part of that extra cost is “not urgent” and could easily be put off.
Mayor John Tory told me Monday he has from the beginning been “very concerned” about any proposal that takes out two lanes of traffic on Yonge and has been working to achieve a “balanced alternative” with bike lanes on Beecroft Rd.
That said, there will be a pile of speakers supporting the bike lanes on Yonge at Tuesday’s meeting. Let’s hope councillors aren’t swayed by the cyclepaths.
 
This whole "debate" is so stupid and so typical of Toronto politics these days.
Yonge Street is 4 lanes through downtown AND they managed to knock it down to 2 for a few weeks in the summer. Why is 6 so crucial in North York?

(Where does it shift to 4 permanently? I guess south of Hogg's Hollow? And, unlike NYC, there isn't a ring road there to push traffic onto.)

I also love when alleged fiscal conservatives like Holyday and Tory throw out, "It's clearly the better choice, except for the cost." And then instantly go, "Oh, well, costs be damned, let's ignore staff and keep the Gardiner or move the bike lanes or whatever..."

If it was more expensive but supported by staff and the councillor, you'd at least have a leg to stand on. But when it's 0 for 3, I'm just embarrassed for you, having to stand there and justify spending more money, just cuz, while talking out the other side of your mouth about being responsible with tax dollars.

If they had any real stones they'd find a way to shunt more traffic on to Doris and Beecroft but instead they're too busy patting themselves on the back for baby steps that should have been done a decade ago, like the King pilot and Bloor bike lanes.

IMHO, to keep the same road configuration that's been in NYC since the 80s, as if the situation hasn't fundamentally changed, is obviously dumb. Oh well, just put it on the tab and keep those tax increases below the rate of inflation and my Finch-401 travel time at 8 minutes instead of 10 and all is right int he world, I guess.
 
Toronto Sun
By Sue-Ann Levy Feb. 27

The highly controversial Yonge St. bike lane proposal is expected to be nixed in favour of a parallel route when it returns to public works committee Tuesday.
Councillor Steven Holyday, who sits on public works, said Monday he can’t support a project that calls for removing lanes on Yonge St. — north of Sheppard — as proposed in the Reimagining Yonge plan.
“There’s a lot of condemnation about doing this,” he said. “It’s (the area is) already a bottleneck.”
The $51-million option — a pet project of well-past-his-due-date NDP Councillor John Filion — proposes not just repaving Yonge St. but removing two lanes of traffic, from Sheppard to Finch Aves., to accommodate cycle tracks, wider sidewalks, new trees, street furniture and planters.
A second alternative — studied in the fall of last year as part of a $2-million environmental assessment — proposes putting the bike lanes on neighbouring Beecroft Rd. instead. It has a $71-million pricetag.
Holyday said the second alternative appears to “make sense” except for its cost — an extra $20 million.
He said he understands that the acquisition of property that forms a significant part of that extra cost is “not urgent” and could easily be put off.
Mayor John Tory told me Monday he has from the beginning been “very concerned” about any proposal that takes out two lanes of traffic on Yonge and has been working to achieve a “balanced alternative” with bike lanes on Beecroft Rd.
That said, there will be a pile of speakers supporting the bike lanes on Yonge at Tuesday’s meeting. Let’s hope councillors aren’t swayed by the cyclepaths.

Councillor Shiner won his motion,..... it's "Transform Beecroft" with "Enhanced Yonge",.... not at $71 million,.... but only adding about $7-9 million to the original $51million "Transform Yonge" option without the property acquisition on Greenview
 
Anyways,.... anyone want to guess what's the huge red flag in the original "Transform Yonge" option
IMG_1039aGOOD2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1039aGOOD2.jpg
    IMG_1039aGOOD2.jpg
    186 KB · Views: 468

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-27_15-18-47.png
    upload_2018-2-27_15-18-47.png
    18.4 KB · Views: 621
  • upload_2018-2-27_15-19-9.png
    upload_2018-2-27_15-19-9.png
    18 KB · Views: 598
Last edited:
What's that, they passed a last minute hybrid type option not supported by staff or any objective data or study? Well, that's just shocking!

So nice of Shiner, who represents the adjacent ward but lives in neither, to help Filion like that! I guess that's his job, to broker compromise and think about the big picture when pesky local councillors are thinking too much about local affairs. I look forward to him getting reelected until he decides he's finally made the city as perfect as he can and passes the baton. Jeeze.
 

Councillor Shiner's motion but Concillor Holyday moved it,....
the bike sharrows are only in front of a few properties along Greenview Ave north of Finch until they put in development application then City gets conveyance of setback for cycletracks:

2 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Stephen Holyday (Carried)
That:
1. City Council approve the "Enhance Yonge and Transform Beecroft" alternative, including streetscape and safety improvements, sidewalk widening, and 6 lanes of traffic on Yonge Street, along with the provision of cycle tracks on Beecroft Road, subject to the following conditions:
a. That property acquisition required along Greenview Avenue between Finch Avenue West to Hendon Avenue be excluded from the "Enhance Yonge and Transform Beecroft" alternative, reducing the cost of Transform Beecroft from $22 million to approximately $9 million, and that this cycling connection be accommodated with shared lane pavement markings (sharrows) implemented until such time that Beecroft Road is extended north to Drewry Avenue and this section of Greenview Avenue reconstructed and widened.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to conclude the REimagine Yonge EA, if required, on the basis that an EA would not be required for the reconstruction of Yonge Street and Beecroft Avenue where there is no change to the capacity (e.g. number of lanes) or location of the reconstructed roads.
3. City Council amend the Transportation Services 2018 Capital Budget and Plan increasing the 2018 total project costs and cash flow by $4.0 million gross, funded from $2.0 Million Public Transit Infrastructure Fund (PTIF) and $2.0 million Capital Financing Reserve.
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2018.PW27.1
 
So nice of Shiner, who represents the adjacent ward but lives in neither, to help Filion like that!

He lives/lived around Bayview and Sheppard, right on the boundary between the two wards. (That's the most recent info, but since the last election his home was sold and torn down to build a condo building.)
 
He lives/lived around Bayview and Sheppard, right on the boundary between the two wards. (That's the most recent info, but since the last election his home was sold and torn down to build a condo building.)

Not that it's the biggest issue here but didn't he have an apartment at Yonge /Eglinton ?

Either way , he came up with a solution over what staff and the local councillor recommended.
 
Not that it's the biggest issue here but didn't he have an apartment at Yonge/Eglinton?

I'm just going by his filings for the city election. He claimed 8 Cusack Court as his home

Either way, he came up with a solution over what staff and the local councillor recommended.

The local councillor shouldn't be overriden? Does this mean, for example, that only Glenn De Baeremaker, Michael Thompson and Michelle Holland should have a voice in the Scarborough Subway/LRT debate? Should Mammoliti be unchallenged over the sale of that parking lot for his stupid giant flag pole, since he's the local councillor?
 
Anyone know when in March is the final vote? And how soon can reconstruction start?

I'm just looking forward to any kind of improvement.
 

Back
Top