News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
Thank God, that stretch of Jasper is flat out embarrassing and rundown.

Is there any Jasper Ave New Vision construction work taking place this summer?
 

Fantastic news. I'm hoping we'll see shovels in the ground before the end of 2024, though maybe that's not realistic?
 
315FFA51-B4EE-4EF3-ABC7-D27A20CFBB28.png1FF1976B-28AA-4FFB-BDF0-BCDC249F2424.png

Exciting news!

Anyone know where more info is on the 400mil fund the gov is allocating to active transportation? Maybe more will still come for us, but 9mil (2.5%) doesn’t seem like a ton when we’re 4.1% of the population and I’d imagine funding would skew even more towards large metros vs evenly across all population.
 
View attachment 471068View attachment 471069

Exciting news!

Anyone know where more info is on the 400mil fund the gov is allocating to active transportation? Maybe more will still come for us, but 9mil (2.5%) doesn’t seem like a ton when we’re 4.1% of the population and I’d imagine funding would skew even more towards large metros vs evenly across all population.

Not aware. But in doing a quick news search lots of announcements have been made.

The municipality of North Grenville in Ontario with a population of 18,000, received nearly $1 million so your theory may be off.

 
Not aware. But in doing a quick news search lots of announcements have been made.

The municipality of North Grenville in Ontario with a population of 18,000, received nearly $1 million so your theory may be off.

Yeah, maybe they’ll use funding to support smaller municipalities, and they’ll expect cities to carry more of the load? But idk, if the goal is climate related, you’d think the biggest bang for your buck would be looking at things like Edmontons bike plan and funding a good chunk of it for 20-40mil. (5-10% of the fund).
 
Just noticed this, sorry if it's been discussed before. Anyone know why they cut these trees? Feel so rare to have big trees, especially in medians in our downtown. Not trying to keep them seems weird. The new planters are beautiful, but could we not road diet a little more to keep the canopy? Or did we need such wide sidewalks in the expense of losing the trees?


Screen Shot 2024-05-07 at 10.58.45 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-05-07 at 11.00.42 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-05-07 at 10.59.24 AM.png
 
Those trees were in 'concrete coffins' in that median and were likely not very healthy (even though the photos show many leaves) and I believe the new trees were planted in soil cells so they should do MUCH better.
 
Changing the road to eliminate the boulevard eliminated the trees. The new trees would be planted in soil cells and hopefully grow quite fast. See 108 Street as an example.

We are going to probably loose mature trees along 105 Street when they redo Beaver Hills House Park as well. I have real mixed feelings about this. If the trees are approaching the end of their life, putting new trees in soil cells makes sense at the time of renewal, because that only happens ever 40 or so years. However, we are going to loose a lot of greenery and new trees Downtown have been decimated by the street population in terms of vandalism.
 
I do feel we are too quick to remove older trees. They are probably better able to withstand climate conditions, neglect and vandalism than newly planted trees that are likely very vulnerable especially in the first few years.
 

Back
Top