I take full responsibility :) 150m+ is a global standard, but having both 100m+ and 150m+ would be amazing

Looks like the hight increased from 29/26/2 to 30/27/3

Love the reflection on the river! :)

I've been told tha there is a brake-ground ceremony for this project today.

In my view, improving walkability should be done one project at a time (with proper long-term planning). Adding retail is the easiest way to do it. Although, it might look out of place for few years. At one point there will be more buildings along this stretch. Potentially also a streetcar, or...

Very disappointed that there is no retail here :(

I would personally love to see an article on UT containing @3Dementia and @Koops65 analysis, together with the potential "new stuff". @interchange42 is this possible? It's great to finally see the GTA number for different heights of skyscrapers, not just Toronto proper! I would also love the...

Is that being discussed?

I'll try my best 🙂 Hopefully, next time the light will be in my favor...

Taken today

I feel this analysis of yours is more informative :) Total number of 150+ metre towers Built and U/C: Toronto - 121 (85 + 36) https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=100562873 Mississauga and Vaughan - 22 (7 + 15) https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=100562897...

All 3 (416, 905 and GGH) tell an interesting story, but I would argue that the least important one should be the 416, as those lines are more arbitrarily drawn, whereas the 905 and GGH are more in line where people are clustering (choose to live). In international ratings, especially in Asia...

I'm so happy that he's making videos again! Amazing content! Higher order transit on Jane would be extremely beneficial and it's so unfortunate that our politicians can't understand this. The only thing I would like to see included in these (distant future) plans, is an extension South to the...

Couldn't agree more! Just a terrible look for something on a waterfront for sure. That car garage should have been done way better :(

So interesting how future extension of Line 1 triggers new development, but Bloor and Danforth are resisting new density along existing (decades old) Line 2

I guess 1200 Bay and 80 Bloor will not be allowed to be built together? Should be one, or the other, I guess?

Amazing work as always!!! Can I suggest adding few more projects (I was lazy to include everything that is coming to Queensway) : https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/backyard-neighbourhood-condos https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/2313-lake-shore-boulevard-west...

I agree that we need way more of these across Toronto. On the other hand, at least a kilometre away from (most) subway stations developments should have more density, preferably with a retail component. Just my two cents...

Taken today: With Humber river: In context of relative proximity to Islington and Kipling:

So GTA finally has the same number of completed and U/C 150m+ as the whole Chicagoland? 😁 Toronto 118 Mississauga 11 Vaughan 8 GTA 137 https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/city/vaughan https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Mississauga