Yesterday Danielle Smith said unequivocably that if
Janice Johnson is elected, she will not sit as a member of the UCP caucus in the legislature.
Today, less that 24 hours later, Danielle Smith says that Johnson - who compared transgender students in schools to feces in food - would have “a lot of work to do” to find her way into the party’s caucus.
Smith then went on to say that she believes in redemption and second chances, but Johnson "would need to prove herself".
I wonder, should they both be elected, what the over/under will be on Johnson completing enough hard work in Smith's opinion to welcome her back for the fall sitting?
That would make it less than a year from having made those odious comments and less than half a year from those comments being exposed publicly to being back at the trough, oops, I mean back at the table.
I guess you don't have to be in formal breach of the Conflicts of Interest Act in order to demonstrate a lack of ethics...