News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

It is all improvement. Adding bike lanes means they rethink the road, rethinking the road for a bike lane means they rethink the road for cars too. Everyone benefits. It is that simple. The only case I can think where a road would be made worse for cars by adding a bike lane is if they completely closed a road to cars in favor of only pedestrians and bikes. This does not happen.
 
Who has the right of way here? (note the curb ramp on the left side)

Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 10.14.23 PM.png


I found a Transpo Alberta document explaining the standards to install this sign, but I haven't found anything to clarify the rules.

City website has a slightly different sign, though it seems to be for a crosswalk situation...is this a crosswalk?
https://www.calgary.ca/roads/safety/bike-signage-signals.html
 
It's a road intersection. The cars have the right of way, the bike route has a stop sign (not visible from the road, but the shape is):
1729751584665.png


Not that I ever use this; in my experience I always hit a red on 7th. Once I cross 7th on the green light, the light at 6th is always red, so I (and most cyclists I see) cross in the crosswalk to the west curb by Contemporary Calgary, then cross straight north with the light in the crosswalk on the left side of the road in your picture above. I'd rather ride in front of turning traffic in a crosswalk than take my chances riding across 2 lanes of fast traffic midblock in a completely novel situation without even the right of way for my widow to point to.
 
Last edited:
I used to ride 11th every day, but got tired of nearly getting hit by drivers swerving through the bike lane to get around turning cars that I refuse to use 11th now. When I did, I never once used that useless piece of infrastructure (nor did I ever see anyone use it), I always crossed in the crosswalk that actually connected to the pathway system. You can tell this was designed by someone who never cycles lol.

Speaking of bike lanes and pathways, this city is so bad at this it's mind boggling. They have the south pathway closed for work between Edworthy and Crowchild (and many stretches for the Pumphouse Park "improvements" as well). so they detour you to the north side of the river, which is closed for the feeder main. Your only choice is to sit at a light for 20 minutes waiting to cross Parkdale Blvd. If you decide to cross Crowchild, all the pathways on the north side of Memorial are closed for maintenance. Calgary claims this city is friendly to cyclists, to the point where they try to reduce the parking on new developments and promote bike parking, but then they close all the pathways at the same time so you can't cycle anywhere. Just ridiculous planning, too many crayon eaters making the decisions these days.
 
So much thought was put into this but it makes no sense. RiverWalk will clean this up.

Hopefully the 11th St underpass ends up active mode only, which would facilitate a fully protected bidirectional solution on one side of 11th St. My first instinct would be west side, but that sets up the current conflict of limited crossing time vs the NB-WB traffic movement, and doesn't link as well with 8th Ave or Kerby Station. I can envision something good on the east side
 
As a driver and a cyclist, I disagree. 11th is one of the few N-S connections between downtown and the Beltline and is a critical access for drivers to get onto Bow Tr west. The current configuration serves CP more than anyone else so something needs to be done, but it should accommodate cars, cyclists (and other wheelers) and pedestrians equally.
 
As a driver and a cyclist, I disagree. 11th is one of the few N-S connections between downtown and the Beltline and is a critical access for drivers to get onto Bow Tr west. The current configuration serves CP more than anyone else so something needs to be done, but it should accommodate cars, cyclists (and other wheelers) and pedestrians equally.
I bolded the important part. Here's the current conditions at 10th Ave
1729808056875.png


And here's a better version that accommodates cars, cyclists (and other wheelers) and pedestrians equally, specifically 20 feet each.
1729808441400.png
 
And here's a better version that accommodates cars, cyclists (and other wheelers) and pedestrians equally.
Sort of. Pedestrians and cyclists can just scoot around someone waiting to turn left in front of them, unlike cars, trucks and buses on a two lane road with hard barriers.

I know this has been an issue on 11 St around 11 Ave since they put the bike lanes in - see Mountain Man's comment above.

(Edit: I suppose it could be partly fixed with advance turn signals)
 
Last edited:
I think there is enough room on 11th to have a single through lane in each direction as well as a turn lane. The option above includes 7' for bike racks and 4' for benches, but these aren't required for the entire length of the street. IF there is a retail use or a park that fronts onto 11th then sure, bike racks and a bench would be nice. The city forces developers to include this stuff on DPs now, so if a use is proposed that warrants bike racks and benches, that's going to be on private property anyway. A more accurate picture would be light poles, transformers and pull boxes in that space lol.
 
As a driver and a cyclist, I disagree. 11th is one of the few N-S connections between downtown and the Beltline and is a critical access for drivers to get onto Bow Tr west. The current configuration serves CP more than anyone else so something needs to be done, but it should accommodate cars, cyclists (and other wheelers) and pedestrians equally.
I bolded the important part. Here's the current conditions at 10th Ave
View attachment 607042
I wonder what this area adjacent to the LRT Station would look like.

1730142508946.png


I would put the east sidewalk as one of the Top 5 most woefully designed and undersized sidewalks given the context and demand for space given the thousands of LRT users walking through on an less than a metre sidewalk with tree wells and crappy concrete falling apart, in a vehicle splash zone. And a bus stop on top of that - imagine if there's snow here!

As usual, the big space hog is for vehicles. The LRT and the avenues add a bunch of complexity here, so essentially as a driver or pedestrians you are guaranteed to wait for a long or super long red light somewhere between 9th and 6th Avenue. This creates a pretty substantial congested feeling, but it's only made up of a dozen or so cars - probably the long signal times is triggering engineers to want more queuing space for idling vehicles Meanwhile, strollers and LRT uses are jostling and waiting to pass single file for a block nearest to all to wait for 4 minutes to cross 9th or 6th Avenues. All this is complicated by the volumes of the E-W avenues being their highest in the area, therefore giving 11th such a low priority in comparison, therefore long signals, therefore larger queue lanes, therefore no space for acceptable sidewalks ... etc.

The street has other quirks too. This SB turn lane onto 9th Avenue is wild - a full block queue for one of the least likely turn movements in the city. The LRT arm is for some reason in the middle of the road, making the area with the smallest sidewalk also have an in-ordinately large median space to protect the arm mechanism.

All in all, the movements of vehicles connecting to Beltline is pretty low on the list for me - it's a nice-to-have, but not a need and there's several other areas of the street (the sidewalks) that are so deficient that they should take significant priority over the other issues. Although cars to the Beltline also don't seem to be the materially significant issue here either - there's plenty of other design trade-offs that screw over pedestrians on the corridor, with or without 11th connecting to the Beltline.
 

Back
Top