Avenuer
Senior Member
Still on the website: https://oneproperties.com/properties/paramount/Is this project still on their radar or is it longer-term?
Still on the website: https://oneproperties.com/properties/paramount/Is this project still on their radar or is it longer-term?
Starting in 2024, the derelict tax subclass can be applied to residential properties in mature neighbourhoods that show serious signs of neglect, are falling into significant disrepair or are unlivable.
It is zoned DC1 and has a proposed 369-unit residential tower under that zoningSince when is the Paramount a residential site?
It was closed due to safety/core issues. Hence why it hasn’t been used.Its too bad the facility is not being put to more use while it languishes,waiting for redevelopment, possibly for years.
No, no it's not.Also as an FYI, the old Dwayne's home is confirmed under this derelict properties, which is one block away.
Stevenson says the city can't go after the property owners under its derelict properties tax subclass because the building isn't zoned as a residential property.
See below:No, no it's not.
![]()
'There have been deaths on that property': City plans to demolish former Dwayne's Home building
The city could be on the hook for the bill to demolish a problem building in the heart of Edmonton.edmonton.ctvnews.ca
Coun Salvador was on radio today sharing that 200 properties have been designated as derelict since her motion was passed and so paying 3x regular property tax rate. Of the 200 properties, one is a condo project - I guess this one.
See below:
I am not disputing what is correct or not.I didn't hear anything in that radio interview from February about Dwayne's Place.
Given that this is in Stevenson's ward & an issue she's familiar with, I'll take her statement from earlier this week as being factual in the absence of something concrete.
See below:
I am not disabling my ad blocker to read that. What's the gyst?![]()
Shared by YEG-urbanist on SSP