News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.7K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.5K     0 

I wonder how many years it will be for Edmonton to have its next multi-family, mid-density type development that isn't rentals in the downtown/wihkwentowin communities? I'd also like to see some townhome type projects incorporated of various sizes.
 
Yes, it would be nice to see multi family that is not rentals, but I have noticed these things sure go in cycles. I remember a time when all that was being built here was condos and a number of rentals were being converted to condos.

It will probably take a combination of rising rents, lower interest rates and higher prices for SFHs to again make condos more attractive for more people here. This combination seems to be happening, so I think we'll get there.
 

Along the lines of this article here is a hypothetical but I feel fairly realistic example: say an older parent sells their home and then gives their two kids $200,000 each to buy real estate.

One lives in Edmonton and buys an older condo mortgage free, the other lives in a more expensive city (such as GVA or GTA) and buys a similar condo which of course costs much more, so they have mortgage payments of around $1,500/mo.
 
Most of the cheap lofts in DT that were selling for under replacement value are now off the market. I'm talking the Dub conversions mostly.

Still, getting a mortgage on a 1br in DT almost never works out better financially than renting and investing the difference in an S&P500 or global market fund.

I know everyone isn't rational, but I can't see the PBR market slowing significantly in Edmonton.
 
Most of the cheap lofts in DT that were selling for under replacement value are now off the market. I'm talking the Dub conversions mostly.

Still, getting a mortgage on a 1br in DT almost never works out better financially than renting and investing the difference in an S&P500 or global market fund.

I know everyone isn't rational, but I can't see the PBR market slowing significantly in Edmonton.

It really depends on where people are in life and what their goals are. There's some merits beyond rate of return to owning a property or a second property that should be considered for people in different circumstances.
 
It really depends on where people are in life and what their goals are. There's some merits beyond rate of return to owning a property or a second property that should be considered for people in different circumstances.
Yes, owing gives a person more freedom to modify or improve the place and more certainty budget wise (rent increases can be quite large and unexpected).

Also, I feel it is a mistake to assert something will work out financially by projecting past performance into the future. Good investment decisions for the future are to buy low and sell high. I would argue the S&P 500 is sure not low now.
 
Yes, owing gives a person more freedom to modify or improve the place and more certainty budget wise (rent increases can be quite large and unexpected).

Also, I feel it is a mistake to assert something will work out financially by projecting past performance into the future. Good investment decisions for the future are to buy low and sell high. I would argue the S&P 500 is sure not low now.

Yup, we're in an everything bubble. I'm seeing great rates of returns on my other investments but I don't think 20% annually is sustainable when you see which companies dominate the S+P. Everything looks overvalued when you start looking at the fundamentals and that can bubble can quickly burst.

The nice thing about a condo as an investment is that it provides an income stream, has some tax benefits when operating at a loss (if you leverage your improvements and investments wisely), and at the end of the day will pay itself off and provide you affordable housing relative to a rental market that has historically shown volatile swings.
 
Yes, owing gives a person more freedom to modify or improve the place and more certainty budget wise (rent increases can be quite large and unexpected).

Also, I feel it is a mistake to assert something will work out financially by projecting past performance into the future. Good investment decisions for the future are to buy low and sell high. I would argue the S&P 500 is sure not low now.
You’re actually better off buying investments on a regular (monthly or quarterly) basis than trying to “time the market”. If you look at long term trends, interim peaks have little impact and over time you will purchase just as much at low points as at high points.
 
You’re actually better off buying investments on a regular (monthly or quarterly) basis than trying to “time the market”. If you look at long term trends, interim peaks have little impact and over time you will purchase just as much at low points as at high points.
When companies like Apple are growing their revenue by increasing the costs of their products beyond the reach of the target demographic it’s probably prudent to ask if the market can continue performing at the rate it has for the last 12 years. Especially when the S&P is dominated by a handful of companies that you can look at with the same skeptical lens.

I have a feeling that physical assets and capital are going to be important things to own in the next decade or two.
 

Back
Top