picard102
Senior Member
What's going on in Greece?The next few years are going to put the cradle of democracy to the test like never before.
|
|
|
What's going on in Greece?The next few years are going to put the cradle of democracy to the test like never before.
They would think SpaceX can fill the void,
What's the justification for gutting NASA??They believe this unironically. But NASA (and the military) is the actual talent farm for Space X. And a lot of the actual ideas (like recoverable launch vehicles) were long held NASA ideas that they couldn't get funded through Congress. If they legitimately kill NASA, they are going to discover how quickly Space X can fall behind.
What's the justification for gutting NASA??
Honestly why even bother arguing?All the idiots who voted for Trump and his personality cult will get the government they deserve. You can't cut 1/3 of government spending without huge reductions in services and support. Actual staff costs are not 75% of the budget like low info voters imagine. Most spending is direct transfers for services like schools and health care and transfers to persons for things like pensions, etc. I can't wait until all the Trump wrinklies realise that they voted to cut their pensions and health coverage. I never thought the leopards would eat my face!
Voters are quite happy with the Affordable Care Act and some of the protections it provides, like not allowing exclusion due to pre-existing conditions, and allowing adult children to stay on their parents' insurance until they are 26. Until they find out that the ACA is Obamacare, then they hate it. Keep your government hands off my medicare!Since I'm not in the US I don't think of a lot of the polices, I'm happy a few years ago the current administration changed the laws so your insurance can't hit you with "out of network" surprise bills. Even incredibly positive polices don't get noticed if they're passed by someone you dislike.
So, are they saying the Senate should let them all go through so the US public can more clearly understand the chaos that will unfold?This from the Economist's Weekend Newsletter sound on point to me.
"Here’s one prediction for the week ahead. As close scrutiny continues of Donald Trump’s nominees for government, I expect it will become clearer that one or more of them is set to fail. Yes, the incoming president has a powerful electoral mandate. He may say that every colourful name he has announced must take office, even though the likes of Matt Gaetz, Tulsi Gabbard, Robert F. Kennedy junior, Pete Hegseth and others were on the extremist, nutty fringe of politics until recently. (Incidentally, what has Marjorie Taylor Greene done wrong to have not yet been picked for a job?)
I suspect, instead, that Mr Trump is being more Machiavellian. He probably also foresees, and may even welcome, that one or more of his chosen figures will fall away. Perhaps the Senate will block an appointment. Maybe, as details of police inquiries become public in one or more cases, a preferred candidate will be obliged to withdraw. Most of his chosen candidates will get through, but when one or more are blocked Mr Trump can have his cake and eat it: he will bewail the deep state, telling supporters that his opponents want to block the radical changes that he would supposedly bring."
Not how I read it. He seems to me to be saying that Trump has nominated some people to please his MAGA base but knows (and is happy or does not care) that some will not be confirmed. Then he can say "I tried, and the deep state stopped me."So, are they saying the Senate should let them all go through so the US public can more clearly understand the chaos that will unfold?
Some wild stuff, actually. The left-wing party of the previous government (2015-2019) has splintered into three parties.What's going on in Greece?
You've fathomed the reptilian brain.This from the Economist's Weekend Newsletter sound on point to me.
"Here’s one prediction for the week ahead. As close scrutiny continues of Donald Trump’s nominees for government, I expect it will become clearer that one or more of them is set to fail. Yes, the incoming president has a powerful electoral mandate. He may say that every colourful name he has announced must take office, even though the likes of Matt Gaetz, Tulsi Gabbard, Robert F. Kennedy junior, Pete Hegseth and others were on the extremist, nutty fringe of politics until recently. (Incidentally, what has Marjorie Taylor Greene done wrong to have not yet been picked for a job?)
I suspect, instead, that Mr Trump is being more Machiavellian. He probably also foresees, and may even welcome, that one or more of his chosen figures will fall away. Perhaps the Senate will block an appointment. Maybe, as details of police inquiries become public in one or more cases, a preferred candidate will be obliged to withdraw. Most of his chosen candidates will get through, but when one or more are blocked Mr Trump can have his cake and eat it: he will bewail the deep state, telling supporters that his opponents want to block the radical changes that he would supposedly bring."
If the US had expected private industry to fund the space race from back in the '60s, the only reason humanity would have landed on the Moon would have been with a mining claim tag.