chrisw
Active Member
You don't necessarily need an e-bike for the last mile leg.
You also don't necessarily NOT need it given, you know, the location of the likes of Bramalea station. And none of these solutions address the availability of charging infrastructure at downtown bike storage facilities, let alone what that kind of storage is going to cost.You don't necessarily need an e-bike for the last mile leg.
You don't necessarily need an e-bike for the last mile leg.
Banning would only cause more problems then it would fix. Higher fares for them as well as proper places to put them on the trains, and even limiting the number to the number of spots for bikes are all better than trying to ban them.At the end of the day, we are cruising for an outright ban on bikes on trains, or a premium fare to bring a bike.
Do you know how much e-bikes cost?
If you can afford to own two, you're not hurting for cash.
I doubt international students can afford two e-bikes.
for those who dont know "zoomo" and "zygg" are the 2 most popular ebike rental places. Upwards of $300 a month.A lot of these e bikes that the food delivery guys use are rentals. You buy a bunch of e bikes and then rent them out for a daily or weekly fee to international students.
Why did you edit your comment to take out the part where you were on the GO train and people missed their stop because they couldn’t get out because of bikes being in their way?It's time GO transit bans them or better yet have more train cars for bikes only. With transit police patrolling the cars making sure no one brings a bike onboard the other train cars
This would assume everyone with a bike starts and ends at the same station (maybe they do IDK). Otherwise it would impar the dwell time if a rider has to exit their car to enter another cr to get their bike. If a bunch of rider move to the 'bike car' before their station, doesn't that create the same problem? Could all the affected platform handle an extra car?It's time GO transit bans them or better yet have more train cars for bikes only. With transit police patrolling the cars making sure no one brings a bike onboard the other train cars
Every station between Mount Pleasant and Malton has a lot of bikers getting on, they mostly get off at Union but a majority also get off at Bloor.This would assume everyone with a bike starts and ends at the same station (maybe they do IDK). Otherwise it would impar the dwell time if a rider has to exit their car to enter another cr to get their bike. If a bunch of rider move to the 'bike car' before their station, doesn't that create the same problem? Could all the affected platform handle an extra car?
A lot of these e bikes that the food delivery guys use are rentals. You buy a bunch of e bikes and then rent them out for a daily or weekly fee to international students.
for those who dont know "zoomo" and "zygg" are the 2 most popular ebike rental places. Upwards of $300 a month.
NCM is a brand that sells cheap $1k ebikes with the cheapest parts found.
Those 3 make up like 75-90% of the ubers/doordashers
Apparently you are heartless and or racist for not being concerned with their last mile commute.Well if that's the case then this becomes a lot simpler to ban the e-bikes from trains. Those businesses, or others like them would be forced to set up shop near where the deliveries are happening and deal with overnight storage themselves if they want to stay in business. The transit system can stop subsidizing their business model of moving their bikes around and compel them to provide services closer to where they are needed.
I was already wondering if this would be viable after having seen an e-bike rental somewhere around Dundas & Parliament. If the majority of bikes are rented then you're not creating a huge sunk cost for the delivery guys with a ban.
Has anyone said this shit?Apparently you are heartless and or racist for not being concerned with their last mile commute.




