Allandale25
Senior Member
Which, while was built for the service, has not yet been used as a layover point - and with no expected date to start, either.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
Has it ever been used? Even as a temporary or brief layover?
|
|
|
Which, while was built for the service, has not yet been used as a layover point - and with no expected date to start, either.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
Has it ever been used? Even as a temporary or brief layover?
Metrolinx appoints former head of Scottish rail firm as new CEO
Phil Verster resigned as managing director of ScotRail Alliance in January amid controversy about the service’s reliability.
Metrolinx’s next president and CEO is the former managing director of a Scottish rail firm who resigned amid controversy earlier this year.
Media reports from Britain and Ireland, where Verster has spent more than a decade in leadership roles at various rail agencies, describe him as a respected figure in the industry.
In 2015, he became managing director of ScotRail Alliance, the operator of Scotland’s passenger rail service. While there he oversaw a $3-billion electrification of the agency’s network.
In January, however, he resigned after just 18 months on the job. The BBC reported that he had been “facing intense pressure” for the agency’s “failure to meet punctuality and reliability targets.”
Two months before his resignation, Network Rail, which oversees rail operation in Britain, hired an outside agency to probe allegations that he had improperly accepted gifts and hospitality from contractors.
On Thursday, Verster told reporters that the third party audit “found absolutely no evidence” to support the allegations, which were made by an anonymous whistleblower.
He acknowledged that ScotRail’s reliability had fallen below target, but said that he put a recovery plan in place that fixed the problem.
After resigning the Scottish agency, Verster spent several months overseeing the East West Rail project, a new line that will link Oxford and Cambridge.
Prior to his time at ScotRail, he served as the managing director of Network Rail’s London North East service for three-and-a-half years. Before that he was deputy CEO of Irish Rail.
https://www.reddit.com/r/toronto/comments/6vsk28/metrolinx_to_announce_former_director_of_scottish/a friend of mine works for Metrolinx, and has for the past 6+ years. He said in the past 2 years he has basically given up on doing his day-day job, as the quality of work never seemed to matter. All about who you know, and how to network. He's spent the last two years trying to brush shoulders with the many VP's, networking and hoping he falls into the good books with someone and can ride that to the top.
In this case, I am going to guess it is either this guy has had some sort of connection at Metrolinx, or due to the nature of the job they had trouble sourcing a respectable CEO who has rail experience. With everything going on with Transit in Ontario, this job may not have been the most attractive to those who are truly qualified.
[...]
Barrie Yard - 7 trains overnight
[...]
How does this work with the new September schedule? From the aerial, it appears that Barrie Yard has capacity for six 12-car trains, currently holding seven trains by storing two 6-car trains in the space for one 12-car train. But as of September, these two sets are doubled to 12 cars (!) so where does the seventh train sit?
Also, I'm assuming that the new Bradford trainset is a 6-car unit given that it only runs outside peak times. I guess there will be a lot fewer 6-car trains on weekends (1/3, rather than 2/3 currently) which is a shame because those trains are so much faster than the lumbering 10- 0r 12-car sets.
So how much faster would a EMU go as opposed to a DMU? It it's acceleration 50%, 100%, 200% faster and what about it's de-acceleration? I know they are faster in both but never really have had an idea about how much faster. Thanks.
How does this work with the new September schedule? From the aerial, it appears that Barrie Yard has capacity for six 12-car trains, currently holding seven trains by storing two 6-car trains in the space for one 12-car train. But as of September, these two sets are doubled to 12 cars (!) so where does the seventh train sit?
Also, I'm assuming that the new Bradford trainset is a 6-car unit given that it only runs outside peak times. I guess there will be a lot fewer 6-car trains on weekends (1/3, rather than 2/3 currently) which is a shame because those trains are so much faster than the lumbering 10- 0r 12-car sets.
Here's a video I took yesterday tracking the acceleration of a 6-car MP40 set out of Rutherford and York University stations. Unfortunately for me, the train was on time, so it wasn't necessarily driving as fast as possible.
In the video how does the northbound train that passes you at 1:55 service York University Station?
Thanks for GO video.
So how much faster would a EMU go as opposed to a DMU? It it's acceleration 50%, 100%, 200% faster and what about it's de-acceleration? I know they are faster in both but never really have had an idea about how much faster. Thanks.
That is the northbound 'deadhead' (out of service) which is heading to Aurora to begin the 18:03 southbound trip (since the 16:28 Northbound from Union continues to Barrie rather than turning back at Aurora like the rest of them). So it doesn't need to serve the station. Later this year when Downsview Park replaces York U station and the double track is completed to Rutherford, I'd like to see that deadhead become an in-service run from Union to Aurora, allowing the 16:28 to make limited stops from Union to Aurora (then all stops to Barrie).
Why is it even deadheading? Why can it not go to Aurora in service?